設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 2|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

Cheap NFL Jerseys

[複製鏈接]

7491

主題

7625

帖子

2萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
23265
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2018-1-2 22:28:08 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
The stadium could be ready for the 2019 season.
Rams owner Stan Kroenke is part of a group planning a new stadium in suburban Los Angeles,Cheap Jerseys Free Shipping, leading to speculation the team will move back to the West Coast, perhaps as early as 2016.
The ruling is a win for supporters of a stadium proposal that's part of an effort to either keep the Rams in St. Louis or lure another team. The Rams currently play in the Edward Jones Dome, which is outdated by NFL standards. The new stadium would be along the Mississippi River.
The St. Louis stadium proposal was announced in January. The open-air stadium is expected to cost $998 million. Bond extensions would provide $201 million — $66 million from the city and $135 million from the state. A combination of seat licenses,Jerseys NFL Wholesale, state tax credits and other incentives would help pay for it. About half the money would come from the team owner and an NFL loan program.
"There will be public meetings and other opportunities for public participation regarding financial assistance for a new stadium," Ponder said in a news release issued by the city.
Ammann's clients had sought to intervene in the suit, a request Frawley denied in a separate ruling Monday.
"As we continue to make excellent progress on the stadium project, this is a great time for everyone in the St. Louis region to rally on behalf of something that will make a difference in our economy, national profile and quality of life for generations to come," Peacock said in a statement.
The ruling came in a lawsuit that the St. Louis Regional Convention and Sports Complex Authority, which operates the Edward Jones Dome, filed against the city to block enforcement of the St. Louis ordinance. The dome operators support the stadium proposal, which would extend bonds that are still paying for construction of the dome.
The Rams are year-to-year on their lease at the dome, which opened in 1995, the year the Rams arrived from Los Angeles.
Dave Peacock, a former Anheuser-Busch executive who is part of a two-person team leading a stadium task force appointed by Gov. Jay Nixon, called the ruling "a victory for a bold and promising future for the NFL in St. Louis" and the rebirth of downtown.
"The voters and taxpayers now have no formal voice in whether they will pay for a new stadium, or how much," Ammann said.
John Ammann, a Saint Louis University law professor who filed a separate suit that sought a city vote on the stadium plan, said it was "a terrible day for local democracy."
The ruling comes about a week before the stadium task force is scheduled to meet with NFL officials in Chicago. With three teams — the Rams, the San Diego Chargers and the Oakland Raiders — all seeking moves to Los Angeles, the league is trying to sort out who should stay and who should go.
ST. LOUIS (AP) — The effort to build a new riverfront football stadium in St,Cheap Jerseys Outlet. Louis got a big boost Monday when a judge ruled that approval from city voters is not necessary to use city tax money for the project.
He also ruled that the stadium plan does not break a state law requiring it to be "adjacent" to the city's convention center,Wholesale Jerseys, even though several blocks separate the two sites. Frawley ruled that Missouri courts have determined that "adjacent" simply means nearby.
Mary Ellen Ponder, chief of staff to Mayor Francis Slay, called the ruling "very disappointing" and said the city will "honor the spirit of the ordinance."
St,Cheap Jerseys Online. Louis Circuit Judge Tomas Frawley's ruling voided a city ordinance requiring voter approval for any project using tax dollars for a professional sports facility. He called the 2002 law's language confusing and vague,Cheap NFL Jerseys China.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-5-18 10:15 , Processed in 0.065126 second(s), 26 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表