設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 9|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

[中一] Cheap Jerseys Store

[複製鏈接]

7599

主題

7728

帖子

2萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
23577
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2018-1-3 09:21:49 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
Lead announcer Joe Buck used to espouse a "less is more" philosophy in analyzing questionable calls, not wanting to be burned by his lack of expertise. Then the network added what Buck calls the "the greatest gift we've been given": the ability to bring in Pereira to offer an instant, definitive assessment.
But some calls will always be wrong, no matter how much replay is expanded in the future.
Still, he knows the scrutiny on each call will be relentless. For officials today, he says,NFL Jerseys 2018, "the only acceptable level of performance is perfection."
Pereira asserted that pass interference should have been called against the Cowboys in their wild-card win over the Lions. A week later, he correctly predicted that a Dallas catch would be overturned at Green Bay.
What sticks in people's minds is the loop of Renfro's feet touching inbounds while NBC's Dick Enberg and Merlin Olsen proclaim a touchdown.
Of the more than 40,000 plays that took place in the 2014 regular season, NFL spokesman Michael Signora says, officials were graded as correct nearly 96 percent of the time and averaged fewer than one incorrect call per game.
NBA referees are correct at a similar rate when they blow their whistles, says Rod Thorn,Wholesale Adidas Hockey Jerseys, the league's president of basketball operations. But when the accuracy of the calls they don't make is factored in, the percentage dips. That's one of many pieces of data the NBA is now tracking, to try to keep up with the ever-more-demanding expectations of fans who get to dissect slow-motion, HD replays.
Pereira used to be in charge of ensuring the NFL got calls right. These days, he lets millions of fans know if a call is wrong.
The NFL first tried instant replay from 1986-91 and introduced the current system in 1999.
"The innocence of that is gone," he says.
Buck is no Luddite when it comes to instant replay. Yet he acknowledges he went to sleep two straight Sunday nights feeling a bit conflicted about the thrilling games he had just called: The disputed officiating decisions had overshadowed everything else.
NEW YORK (AP) — The officials huddled to sort out the close call,NFL Jerseys From China, so the TV broadcast showed the clip over and over,Cheap NHL Jerseys, the announcers declaring a definite touchdown.
Watch video of old NFL games, Pereira says, and it's conspicuous "how many mistakes were made." Pereira wonders if the surging popularity of the sport, not to mention the rise of gambling and fantasy football, leaves fans more invested — and accordingly more infuriated at missed calls.
Now fans think that at least a few times per game. Other sports joined the NFL in instituting video reviews,Authentic NFL Jerseys Wholesale, and viewers at home can follow along as their own replay officials.
Renfro agrees. He refuses to lament that instant replay wasn't available back in January 1980. In fact, he was ambivalent about the NFL instituting it, describing himself as "old school."
Fox has leaned on him heavily on critical rulings the last two Sundays.
"There's more pressure than ever to get it right," Entz says.
Those advances allow officials to get more and more calls right. They also may make fans, players and coaches less and less tolerant when mistakes are made.
But as the game — and the money involved — got bigger, he came around to the idea. And he figures the most memorable play of his 10-year career probably had something to do with the policy.
Major League Baseball instituted video reviews for many on-field calls last season after Commissioner Bud Selig long argued human error was part of the game. The NBA has gradually expanded the scope of replay since adopting it in 2002. The NHL started reviewing goals in 1991, with ongoing discussions about widening the use of video.
While working the baseball playoffs last fall, Buck happened to catch an old Yankees-Dodgers World Series on MLB Network. There was a close play at first base, and Buck realized he was conditioned to expect nine replays. Instead, the announcers briefly noted it was tough to tell if the runner was safe or out, then moved on.
They can watch more and better camera angles in high-definition super slow motion. Rewind the play on their DVRs. Instantly look up analysis and images on social media. Rehash the decision on 24/7 sports television.
After retiring as the league's officiating chief in 2010, Pereira joined Fox in a newly created role as a rules analyst. The concept proved so popular that other networks hired their own.
Standard fare today — but not so 35 years ago. Mike Renfro,Cheap China Jerseys Authentic, whose lunging catch in the back of the end zone was eventually ruled incomplete, suspects that's why so many fans remember — and rue — the play from the 1979 AFC championship game.
"Officiating is better than it's ever been," Mike Pereira insists. "But people don't think that."
In Sunday's conference championship games, Pereira and CBS's Mike Carey will be on hand for instant analysis. Pereira believes the NFL benefits from educating fans, and he's careful to disagree with a ruling, not criticize a ref.
Fans who list the non-catch as one of the most notable botched calls in NFL history may not recall this: Had the upstart Houston Oilers been awarded the touchdown against the reigning Super Bowl champion Steelers, it merely would have tied the score late in the third quarter. Pittsburgh went on to win 27-13.
"He's become such a part of the fabric of watching the game," says John Entz, Fox's executive producer for NFL coverage.

"The standard has been raised because everybody sees these things now," says Thorn, who has been involved with the league in some fashion since 1963.
Viewers across America took in that moment and fumed, "It's clear here in my den," Renfro says.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-5-10 22:20 , Processed in 0.066305 second(s), 28 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表