設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 2|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

Authentic NBA Jerseys Cheap uuphtqjb

[複製鏈接]

1萬

主題

1萬

帖子

4萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
45633
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2018-1-14 16:06:47 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
While the government presses stubbornly ahead with the Marriott hotel project, occupancy rates across the sector seeks to suggest that the project lacks viability.President of the Tourism and Hospitality Association, Daniel Gajie, told Kaieteur News that the sector lacks high-end rooms, which he rated as the standard offered by hotels such as the Pegasus and Princess Hotels.Contacted, officials from those hotels put their average occupancy rates at just over 50 per cent. Other Georgetown hotels put their average occupancy at 60 per cent. These figures point to the fact the local hotel industry has excess capacity, except when there are major events in the country.Robert Badal, the owner of the Pegasus Hotel, which has been against the project mainly because he sees it as unfair competition, said that with “high end rooms” comes a certain cost which guests are not willing to pay in Guyana.He said most travelers to Georgetown who stay in the main hotels are business travelers and they are not willing to pay the US$300-US$400 for high end rooms.“If we charge US$200 a room we wouldn’t get any guests,” Badal told Kaieteur News.Badal said that if the project was feasible, the private sector, including him, would have jumped at it.But he said increase in room supply without increase in demand would threaten local investors,Jerseys Cheap, and this should not happen.The government has been using media houses which are supportive of its views to plug the need for the Marriott-branded hotel which is being built mainly with taxpayers’ dollars.Badal, who has been a fierce critic of the project, has said that the government should spend taxpayers’ money on public projects that would serve the needs of the people.It is Badal’s opinion that the Marriott-hotel project is only intended to fill the pockets of a few persons, with the project seemed bent on failure.The project was not subjected to Parliamentary review, and the Alliance for Change (AFC) this week called for the government to halt any public spending on the project.The project puts taxpayers at risk of losing US$48.0m plus escalation if the project fails.The financial plan only has investors putting US$8 million in the project, with NICIL, the government’s investment arm putting US$21 million and another US$$21 million coming from a bank bond that industry sources believe has the backing of the government despite its denial.In the arrangement with Republic Bank (Trinidad), taxpayers’ rights rank last to other investors.The syndicated loan, as is the arrangement with Republic Bank, is one that is provided by a group of lenders and is structured, arranged and administered by one or several commercial banks or investment banks.In this case, the loan is being administered by the Republic Bank but the government has not named the other lenders.By agreeing to this type of loan arrangement, the government is agreeing for the investors who are part of the syndicate, to get back their investment first ahead of any other investor in the project.So, if in a scenario where the project fails and the value of the property depreciates to a value below what the investors have plugged, then the investors will get back their money, and there would be nothing to return to NICIL, meaning that taxpayers’ dollars would go down the drain.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-6-1 23:45 , Processed in 0.046402 second(s), 26 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表