設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 2|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

[本地音樂] Cheap NFL Jerseys China 2

[複製鏈接]

3萬

主題

3萬

帖子

9萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
95416
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2018-2-9 18:35:11 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
…AG gets seven days to answer Granger’s challenge of “illegal” spendingThe government was yesterday given seven days to say why Chief Justice Ian Chang should not grant a ConservatoryFinance MinisterAshni SinghOrder, on behalf of Opposition Leader Brigadier (rtd) David Granger, to stay all spending or further spending by Finance Minister, Ashni Singh, or any other Government Ministers on programmes disapproved by the National Assembly.Granger’s lawyers filed a legal challenge in the High Court last Thursday via affidavit to halt all unapproved spending by the Administration until the current matter has been determined. When the matter was called yesterday morning, A Partnership for National Unity (APNU) representatives, agreed to give the government a chance to respond as to why the stay should not be issued.The opposition lawyers were seeking an ex-parte injunction. However, it was agreed upon by both sides that the government should be given a chance to respond. Attorney General, Anil Nandlall, who is representing the government,Nike Air Max 98 Gundam 2018, will have to file an affidavit in answer, while Basil Williams, one of the lawyers for the plaintiff, will file a further affidavit in reply, if needed.  The two parties will return to court on December 29.Both sides declined to finalise a date for hearing. Instead,Wholesale Nike NFL Jerseys, both sides decided that the December 29 date would be for report.APNU said that its address to the court is in a bid to stop the “unauthorized spending of billions of dollars, monies that were disapproved in the National Budget earlier this year.”The court application named Minister of Finance, Dr. Ashni Singh, the Attorney General and Speaker of the National Assembly, Raphael Trotman as the defendants.Outside of the Order to stay, claims were made for the court to declare that the National Assembly, in keeping with Article 218 (2) of the Constitution, lawfully disapproved in the annual estimates of Revenue and Expenditure of 2014 and was reflected in the Appropriation Bill Number 6 of 2014 and confirmed by the Appropriation Act Number 10 of 2014.The Opposition-controlled National Assembly disapproved some $36.75B. The money included $1.3B from Office of theOpposition Leader Brigadier (rtd) David GrangerPresident (OP) under its Administrative Services programme; $3.8B also from OP for capital estimates also under Administrative Services; some $22B from Ministry of Finance; $1.1B from Ministry of Amerindian Affairs’ Development Fund; $6.78B from Ministry of Public Works capital work and $1.3B from the Ministry of Health’s Regional and Clinical.APNU wants the court to declare that Government unlawfully spent or authorized the spending of monies despite its disapprovals.Minister Singh had admitted that some $4.5B had been spent for the period ended June 16, 2014, “in breach of Articles 217 and 219 (2) of the Constitution and the decisions of the National Assembly to disapprove these Programmes,” court documents highlighted.Among several other things, APNU wants the court to order also that the spending was “unconstitutional, ultra vires, null and void, unreasonable and in breach of the doctrine of the separation of powers”.APNU’s arguments were prepared by Senior Counsel Rex McKay and Attorneys-at-Law Basil Williams, Hewley Griffith,NFL Jerseys China, Lawrence Harris,Cheap Soccer Jerseys, Michael Somersall, Joseph Harmon, James Bond,Cheap Arizona Cardinals Jerseys, LLewellyn John and Bettina Glasford.Some of the disapproval sums affected agencies such as the Government Information Agency (GINA) and the National Communications Network (NCN) and projects including the Specialty Hospital,cheap nfl jerseys, the Cheddi Jagan International Airport Expansion Project and the Amaila Falls Hydro Project.Government had gone to court last year and based on a ruling by the Chief Justice had interpreted it to mean that Parliament could not cut or disapprove the National Budget.The Opposition has objected this notion saying that the architects of the Constitution catered for cutting when it was written that the National Budget has to come before the floors of the House.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-5-19 01:42 , Processed in 0.068755 second(s), 26 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表