設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 8|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

Wholesale Jerseys From China –

[複製鏈接]

3萬

主題

3萬

帖子

9萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
95416
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2018-2-23 19:29:50 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
New York (NYDailyNews.com) – Congressional investigators say Rep. Gregory Meeks appears to have violated federal law by hiding an illegal $40,000 gift he got from a local businessman.The Office of Congressional Ethics released a 67-page report Friday detailing its investigation of the Queens Democrat,Off White Air Max 97 For Sale, a report that followed a Daily News investigation of the seven-term lawmaker.Last year,Cheap Jerseys From China, The News disclosed that in 2007,Cheap Air Jordan Shoes Wholesale, Meeks obtained from a personal friend what he termed a $40,000 “loan” with no documents,Jerseys NBA Cheap China, no specified interest rate, no due date and no payments for more than three years.The OCE saw the “loan” from Queens businessman Edul Ahmad as a gift that should have been listed on Meeks’ 2007 and 2008 financial disclosure forms.“There appears to be no evidence that there were any normal (signs) of a legitimate loan under House rules,Nike Air Max 98 Gundam For Sale,” the report said.The investigators recommended the House Ethics Committee pursue a further review of the “loan,” and the committee quickly agreed to do just that. This is the same committee that recently found Harlem Rep. Charles Rangel violated ethics rules.The report pointed out that Meeks “provided no evidence that any interest rate was set at all, in writing or otherwise, when he received the money from Mr. Ahmad.”The ethics office concluded that the loan “appears to have been a gift” due to the lack of documentation and the fact that Meeks made no payments until paying the loan off all at once in 2010.The OCE declared there was “substantial reason” to believe Meeks broke the law by not reporting this “gift.”Meeks refused to give the ethics office documents it requested during the investigation. As a result, the office suggested the ethics committee subpoena the documents from both Meeks and Ahmad.Meeks disclosed the existence of the “gift” for the first time in his 2009 report and amended his earlier reports in June 2010. He secured the second loan later on that same month to pay off Ahmad.Ahmad also refused to cooperate with the congressional investigators. The FBI busted him last month on mortgage fraud charges in an unrelated probe.Shortly after yesterday’s report was released, Meeks’ lawyers released a letter to the ethics committee arguing that any problems with Meeks’ failure to disclose the “loan” should be handled in-house by the committee.The lawyers,Air Max 2018 Shoes, Brian Svoboda and Andrew Warbrock, argued that the ethics office had no right to examine the issue of the 2007 “loan” because it didn’t begin operations until March 2008.Meeks is also the subject of an ongoing FBI probe into the loan. He did not respond to a request for comment.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-5-19 01:12 , Processed in 0.048964 second(s), 26 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表