設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 5|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

Blake Swihart Jersey raised a diplomatic protest

[複製鏈接]

3萬

主題

3萬

帖子

9萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
95416
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2018-3-25 19:20:50 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
Suriname’s President, Desi Bouterse– Bouterse eyeing int’l resolutionSuriname is not backing down from its claim on the New River Triangle area, in Berbice,Supply Authentic NFL Jerseys, with President Desi Bouterse making it clear that the territory is theirs.According to the De Ware Tijd online news, Bouterse is quoted as saying to the National Assembly that his country will be pursuing actions, based on international laws,Cheap Jerseys From China, to explore the possibility of the issue being handled by means of a “friendly settlement”.Suriname expects the issue over the disputed land will feature for discussion during a future parliamentary sitting.Since assuming the Presidency in 2010, Bouterse had met Guyana’s President Bharrat Jagdeo several times, holding bilateral discussions on further cooperation between the two countries. Already, agreements have been signed for bridging the Corentyne River and for increased trade of goods.The New River Triangle dispute between Guyana and Suriname dates back since 1840 when Robert Schomburgk surveyed the then British Guiana’s borders. Taking the Corentyne River as the border, he sailed up to its source, the Kutari River,Dale Hawerchuk Jersey, in order to delineate the boundary.In 1871, however,Jerseys Wholesale, Charles Barrington Brown discovered the New River, which he deemed the true source of the Corentyne. Thus the New River Triangle dispute was born.The tribunal which dealt with the Venezuela Crisis of 1895 also awarded the New River Triangle to British Guiana. The Netherlands,Cheap Jerseys From China, however,China Jerseys, raised a diplomatic protest, claiming that the New River, and not the Kutari, was to be regarded as the source of the Corentyne and the boundary.The British government in 1900 replied that the issue was already settled by the long acceptance of the Kutari as the boundary.In 1936, a Mixed Commission established by the British and Dutch governments agreed to award the full width of the Corentyne River to Suriname, as per the 1799 agreement.The territorial sea boundary was deemed to prolongate 10° from Point No. 61, three miles from the shore. The New River Triangle, however, was completely awarded to Guyana.The treaty putting this agreement into law was never ratified, because of the outbreak of World War II.In 1936, the Dutch representative Conrad Carel Käyser signed an agreement with British and Brazilian representatives, placing the tri-point junction near the source of the Kutari River.Desiring to put the border issue to a closure before British Guiana would gain independence, the British government restarted negotiations in 1961. The British position asserted “Dutch sovereignty over the Corentyne River, a 10° line dividing the territorial sea, and British control over the New River Triangle.”No agreements were made and Guyana became independent with its borders unresolved. In 1969 border skirmishes occurred between Guyanese forces and Surinamese militias.In 1971, the Surinamese and Guyanese governments agreed in Trinidad to withdraw military forces from the Triangle.The maritime boundary has long been disputed between Guyana and Suriname as well, and led in 2000 to skirmishes between a CGX oil rig doing work for Guyana and the Surinamese coast guard.A five-member tribunal was convened under the rules set out in Annex VII of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, which in 2007 set out its own boundary that differed from both parties’ claims.The tribunal did award sovereignty over the full width of the Corentyne to Suriname, and also awarded Suriname with a 10° territorial sea boundary three miles from the shore, according the 1936 agreement.The rest of the territorial sea boundary, which extends 12 miles from the shore under modern international law, and the boundary separating the Exclusive Economic Zones of both countries, was awarded following a ruling on the Law of the Sea by an international panel.Both Guyana and Suriname appeared before the panel and argued their case.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-5-18 04:34 , Processed in 0.071511 second(s), 26 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表