Cheap NFL Jerseys lfqcmgru

fd9je6mn

President of the Guyana Bar Association (GBA), Teni Housty, says that GBA supports any effort aimed at enhancing the machinery through which justice is administered in Guyana. His comment came in the wake of the passage of the Time Limit for Judicial Decisions Bill,China NFL Jerseys, on Thursday.However, the Bar hopes that this mechanism that has been put in place does not affect the independence of the judiciary or the rule of law.According to him, the Act itself has the potential to create some issues when new rules of court come into force.He added that there are also some concerns about the role of the Chancellor of the Judiciary.Housty noted that the Act also applies to all judges and this may create some concern as it relates to the role of the Chancellor and the Chief Justice in the court system.However, Housty pointed out that the Act will speed up the Administration of justice and will help to reduce the backlog of civil matters, which currently stands at over 21,000.He said that the preliminary comments of the Bar have been addressed. The earlier references to Criminal Trials have been removed.Provisions remain setting down time limits and opportunities for extensions. The Bill applies to decisions in civil cases in the High Court, including interlocutory applications.  It also extends to decisions of the Full Court and the Court of Appeal.Housty, in the Bar Association’s newsletter, had said, “It is important to note the role of the Chancellor of the Judiciary and the powers which are to be vested in the holder of that office. The powers to make regulations regarding a Judge’s annual report should be noted. It should also be noted that applications for extensions are made to the Chancellor.”He added that the transitional provisions should also be taken in account; these provisions make the statute applicable to hearings concluded prior to the coming into force of the Statute.The Bill, nevertheless, raises concerns regarding an overall judicial code of conduct as well as its compatibility with the proposed Rules of Court, which reaffirm the Chief Justice’s role regarding the judicial business of the High Court.Under this Act, a judge may be removed from office for failing to give decisions and reasons within a specified period after a matter has concluded.This newspaper understands that over the years, there have been complaints by members of the legal profession about judges taking extended periods of time to render their decisions. This, they said, contributed in part to the backlog problem.Kaieteur News understands that Sections Three and Four of the Bill states that a decision should be given as soon as possible after the end of the trial but no later than 120 days from the completion date of both civil and criminal matters within which time a decision is given.The Bill provides for a judge to apply for an extension of time in writing to the Judicial Service Commission, at least 21 days before expiration of the prescribed time limit providing reasons and any supporting evidence why he/she cannot meet the time limit and shall propose the duration of any extension to be granted.However, if the Commission refuses to grant any extension, a judge only has 10 days to give his decision.