請選擇 進入手機版 | 繼續訪問電腦版
設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 14|回復: 0

Nike Air Max Cheap Wholesale Before we were civilised

[複製鏈接]

3萬

主題

3萬

帖子

10萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
102747
發表於 2018-4-23 03:20:27 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
Before we were civilised, we resolved conflict by force. The person with the greater ability to use force (the person with power) was the winner and the weaker person was the loser clearly.However,Calvin Ridley Jersey, force was not always the best way to resolve conflict and a fair result was not always achieved when people took matters into their own hands. So,Nike Air Max 95 Mens, society devised another approach to resolving conflict – litigation.Throughout the last couple centuries, people who could not resolve disputes on their own went to court to ask a judge to impose a solution. Judges who were seen as the best people in society to come up with solutions to complex problems made decisions as best they could, applying the law to the facts and trying to balance the interests of the individual with the interest of society.Litigation was perceived to be superior to self-help in resolving disputes because it had procedural safeguards and rules that increased the likelihood that the result would be just. That being said,Air Max 97 Gold, until relatively recently, it was generally used only as a last resort.Before going to court, people would usually try to resolve conflict themselves, or go to a respected person in society to get advice or guidance.Recently, however,Nike Air Max 95 For Sale, litigation has become the automatic first step for people in dispute. Litigation has also been gradually losing its claim as being the best way to resolve conflict, in part because the procedural safeguards that are so important have made it necessary to create cumbersome processes that do not always produce the best and most efficient outcome.So, society is looking for new and innovative methods to deal with people in dispute or, a return to less litigious ways to resolve conflicts. We want results that are fair, but we do not want cumbersome and time consuming processes. We therefore look back to a time when we turned to respected and creative people who had the skills to help us resolve conflict,Nike Air Max Zero Mens, and that look back is leading us to mediation.While mediation in various forms has been around for many years, it is now being reborn as a more effective stage in the evolution of how we, as a society,Adidas Shoes On Sale, resolve conflict.Mediation is a process in which a third party neutrally assists in resolving a dispute between two or more other parties. It is a process of conflict management. It is a non-adversarial approach to conflict resolution.The role of the mediator is to facilitate communications between the parties, assist them in focusing on the real issues of the dispute, and generate options that meet the interest or needs of all relevant parties in an effort to resolve the conflict and to do so without resorting to physical force or invoking the authority of law.This facilitates the interaction between the opposite parties in such a way that solutions or some convergence automatically emerges.Meditation is at present done through a court-connected process and mediators have been accredited as mediators of the Supreme Court of Guyana.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-3-30 09:55 , Processed in 0.080281 second(s), 25 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表