Cheap Jerseys Wholesale pbmcxgc0

sei8tron3

It seems as if this is the season where most rulings handed down by the retired acting Chief Justice, Ian Chang are being appealed. The latest known appellant is Chief Elections Officer (CEO) of the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM),Cheap Jerseys, Keith Lowenfield.On Thursday last, Lowenfield’s attorney, Roysdale Forde appealed Chang’s February, 19 decision not to strike out the Elections Petition that was filed on behalf of the People’s Progressive Party Civic PPP/C. The acting Chief Justice had been presiding over the matter which seeks to challenge the validity of the outcome of the 2015 General and Regional Elections, since last June.In the petition, the applicant (Opposition Member of Parliament Ganga Persaud), who was appointed Elections Agent on the List of Candidates for the PPP/C,Billy Price Jersey, claimed that the elections were “unlawfully conducted” and that the result of the elections was affected or might have been affected by unlawful acts or omissions.Persaud named the Chief Elections Officer, Keith Lowenfield, and leaders of the eight political parties, which contested the last elections, as respondents in the matter.Lowenfield, through his Attorney, Forde subsequently filed a summons to strike out the petition. Forde had contended that sufficient material facts have not been provided in the petition challenging the recently concluded elections.The Attorney held that the petition is frivolous and vexatious. He requested that it be struck out on the grounds that sections of the petition failed to disclose reasonable cause of action. However, Chang ruled that the summons to strike out the Petition was premature and therefore the Court should proceed in hearing it.Retired acting Chief Justice,Cheap Jeseys NFL, Ian ChangGECOM’s CEO,Wholesale Stitched Jerseys, Keith LowenfieldForde told reporters that he viewed the ruling as highly flawed and indicated that he will appeal it.This was done on 14 grounds. Forde said that Chang erred in law when he failed to direct his  mind  to  the  Summons  dated  the  7th  day of  August,  2015,  which  noted that the Elections  Petition  discloses  no  reasonable  cause  of  action, is frivolous  and  vexatious; embarrassing  and  oppressive and an abuse  of  the  process  of  the  Court. The Attorney also said that Chang failed to see that the Petition is in  breach  of  Section  140 (2)  of the  Representation  of  the  People’s  Act.Another ground was that Chang erred  in  law  when  he  failed  to  direct  his  mind  to  the  Summons  and to  apply  the  proper  principles  applicable  to  the  striking  out  of  the Petition on the grounds.The appeal contends that that Chang erred in law when he misconstrued Section 42 of the National Assembly Validity of Election Act Cap. 1:04 in a restrictive manner.The appeal document also stated “The Learned Judge erred in law when he found that the High Court Act Cap.  3:02  when  entertaining and hearing an Election Petition  was  deprived  of the  inherent,  unlimited  and original Jurisdiction to entertain  applications which  fell  outside  the  parameters  of  Article  163  (1)  of  the  Constitution  of  Guyana.”Attorney-at-law Roysdale FordePPP MP,Cheap NFL Jerseys China, Ganga PersaudAnother ground contained in the appeal is that “the learned Judge erred  in  law  when  he  made  a finding  and  determination  with  respect  to  Article  163 (1)  of  the  Constitution  of  Guyana  and  its  relationship with  Section  42 of the National Assembly Validity of Election  Act  Cap. 1:04  without  affording  the  Appellant  an  opportunity  of  responding  to  the  said  finding.”Forde is also contending that  Chang Judge  erred  in  law  when  he  found  that  the  relief  sought  in  the  Summons  dated  the 7th day  of  August,NFL Jerseys Authentic China,  2015,  was  excluded  and  prohibited.In a Petition filed last year,Cheap Jerseys USA, Persaud a PPP/C Member of Parliament underscored that the elections were not held in conformity with the Constitution of Guyana and the Representation of the Peoples’ Act, Chapter 1:03.As such, the opposition essentially requested a recount of all ballot boxes for the last elections and fresh elections were also called for.The PPP/C had claimed that the entire electoral process was flawed; that it contained many procedural errors and instances of fraudulent and/or suspicious actions. “Unrest, fake Statements of Poll (SOPs) and multiple voting were among several causes cited when the PPP/C filed its elections petition.”