設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 40|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

Tyler Bozak Jersey 5szegms2

[複製鏈接]

3萬

主題

3萬

帖子

10萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
102747
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-1-4 11:10:15 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
Investigators probing a $3B attempted loan to the Central Housing and Planning Authority from the GuyanaFormer Housing Minister,Vladimir Konstantinov Jersey, Irfaan AliGeology and Mines Commission (CH&PA) back in January are questioning the reasons for the transaction in the first place.This is because CH&PA’s bank accounts reportedly had a hefty $8B in them.This latest disclosure would raise startling questions over the previous administration’s handling of the country’s finances.The $3B loan would have caused the housing authority to pay interest of up to five percent.The transaction was made public by upset insiders of the Guyana Geology and Mines Commission (GGMC), the regulatory body charged with overseeing the mining sector, and shelved after objections and a court case.The fallouts had caused GGMC to pay lawyers at least $7M in fees to advise them about the legality of the transaction.The then opposition had accused the Government of wanting the monies to spend on its elections campaign.“That is why the people of Guyana want to know why the previous Government and the former housing Minister Irfaan Ali were so insistent on getting this loan. Based on the amount of money that CH&PA had in their accounts,Mario Lemieux Jersey, it appears that there was no need…it just did not make sense,” a senior Government officialGGMC’s Chairman,Nazem Kadri Jersey, Clinton Williamssaid Friday.Back in January,Marcus Kruger Jersey, the Donald Ramotar Cabinet of Ministers issued a directive to GGMC, ordering the body to process a loan to the CH&PA for housing projects.But a number of GGMC officials objected, arguing that it would not be legal and its monies were supposed to target developments in the mining sectors,Artem Anisimov Jersey, not housing.After the transaction, which came to light in the midst of impending elections were objected to, legal advice was paid for.In March, the Cabinet came back with an amended request…the loan was really to boost housing for mining communities.CH&PA Director Ranwell Jordan and Opposition Parliamentarian,Glenn Hall Jersey, Desmond Trotman,Trevor Van Riemsdyk Jersey, took the matter to court with Chief Justice Ian Chang ruling that indeed the transaction would be illegal and should not go through.GGMC’s Chairman, Clinton Williams,Luke Glendening Jersey, claimed that CH&PA had failed to produce a detailed plan on how it intended to spend the monies.At least two prominent lawyers,Jimmy Howard Jersey, Timothy Jonas and Sir Fenton Ramsahoye had raised questions also of the legality.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-5-17 09:24 , Processed in 0.067548 second(s), 26 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表