請選擇 進入手機版 | 繼續訪問電腦版
設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 10|回復: 0

World Baseball Classic Jerseys 2017 v4xpzdbg

[複製鏈接]

1萬

主題

1萬

帖子

4萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
48524
發表於 2018-7-24 17:23:04 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
A High Court order has been handed down,Nike Air Max 97 Buy, quashing the decision of a Magistrate to refund the spousal maintenance fee for New Amsterdam resident,Cheap Blue Jackets Jerseys, Savitree Persuram.The court noted that a decree absolute to discharge spousal maintenance after divorce was unlawful, ultra vires and without legal authority.Savitree Persuram,Edmonton Oilers Gear, the applicant was awarded a maintenance fee upon the dissolution of marriage to her former husband Peter Singh. The divorce was made absolute on July 6, 2007.The then Magistrate of Providence Magistrate’s Court, Priya Sewnarine- Beharry, made an order that Singh must pay his ex-wife $4000 a month for maintenance and $16,000 a month to the two children until they reach the age of 16 years.However,Cheap Oilers Jerseys, Singh,Nike Air Max 2018 Womens, through his lawyers, approached the court to have the maintenance order discharged.When Singh filed for the discharge order,Nike Vapor Max Plus Triple Black, he argued that even before the legal dissolution of their marriage, his ex-wife had left the matrimonial home and had been living with a new partner and that she continues to do so.Persaud, therefore held that the woman was and is capable of taking care of herself  and requested that the maintenance fee $4000  per month  to his ex-wife be discharged.He also requested a reimbursement of the money already paid in maintenance to her.Singh’s request was granted by Magistrate Leron Daly.  Based on the request, the Magistrate ordered that the maintenance fee be discharged and the monies which were already paid as spousal support under the said order be reimbursed.However, on August 17 last,Calgary Flames Gear, Persuram’s Attorney Mark Conway approached the High Court and successfully obtained an order quashing the decree of Magistrate Daly, that initial order for maintenance spousal was unlawful and that the monies amounting to the sum of $387, 000 be returned.Persuram’s attorney argued that the initial order by the Magistrate is lawfully due, payable and cannot return.The lawyer further claimed that the order by Magistrate Daly to have his client return the monies that were lawfully received is unlawful, capricious, contrary to and devoid of natural justice principles without lawful authority and arbitrary.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-3-29 08:30 , Processed in 0.074962 second(s), 23 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表