請選擇 進入手機版 | 繼續訪問電腦版
設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 3|回復: 0

Al MacInnis Jersey a lawyer for Ibrahim

[複製鏈接]

3萬

主題

3萬

帖子

10萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
102747
發表於 2018-7-25 09:48:05 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
NEW YORK (Reuters) – A U.S. appeals court upheld the conviction,Air Max 90 Black Leather, Friday, of a former leader of the Shiite Muslim community in Trinidad and Tobago for his role in a conspiracy to bomb New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport.Imam Kareem Ibrahim, 68,Nike Air Max 97 Silver Bullet, was unable to sway the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York to reverse the 2011 guilty verdict on terrorism-related charges or the sentence of life.Kareem IbrahimProsecutors said Ibrahim provided religious instruction and ‘support to the group planning the failed attack,Cheap Hurricanes Jerseys, which involved destroying buildings,Authentic Baltimore Ravens Jersey, fuel tanks and pipelines at JFK.The federal appeals court said a jury was entitled to find Ibrahim and his co-conspirators guilty of planning to blow up the airport.The ruling followed a decision in May upholding the convictions of co-conspirators Russell DeFreitas and Abdul Kadir,Nike Air Max Outlet Store, who were found guilty in August 2010 and also received life sentences.A fourth man charged in the case, Abdel Nur, pleaded guilty in June 2011 and received a 15-year prison sentence.Prosecutors said Ibrahim joined the plot in May 2007 after meeting with DeFreitas and a confidential FBI informant in Trinidad. Ibrahim among other things gave them advice on avoiding attention by U.S. authorities, prosecutors said.He was arrested in Trinidad in June 2007 and extradited to the United States. A jury in Brooklyn, New York, found him guilty in May 2011 on five terrorism-related counts.On appeal, Ibrahim’s lawyers argued their client’s testimony was improperly limited, that evidence seized from Kadir’s home shouldn’t have been admitted,Gordon Hayward Jersey, and that there wasn’t enough evidence to support his conviction. They also challenged his sentence as unreasonable.But the three-judge appellate panel rejected all of his arguments and upheld the sentence.Michael Hueston, a lawyer for Ibrahim, said his client was considering whether to seek further appeal, including a petition for review by the U.S. Supreme Court.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-3-29 18:00 , Processed in 0.077314 second(s), 25 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表