設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 8|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

[IQ題] Cheap NHL Jerseys at the end of the day

[複製鏈接]

3萬

主題

3萬

帖子

9萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
95416
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2018-7-26 08:05:59 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
The declaration of financial assets is fundamental in addressing the issues of accountability in public office and that of the probity of public officials. This notion was emphasised by Cabinet Secretary, Dr Roger Luncheon, yesterday.Dr Luncheon’s comments came in wake of queries of the constitutionality of the recent exhortation by President Bharrat Jagdeo that all Members of Parliament (MPs) declare their assets to the Integrity Commission. Defaulters, the President had declared, will have their names published in the media.According to the Cabinet Secretary, the Integrity Act of 1997 clearly provides the basis for the action that the President undertook to put into place, and also provides for even more dire consequences.“It is not only that the Act makes provision to name and shame defaulters after they have been warned and their compliance solicited. It also makes provision,Nike Air Max 2018 Release, if they still remain recalcitrant, for them to be summarily charged if they default, and finally,Off White Nike Vapormax Release Date, be convicted.”It was pointed out by Dr Luncheon that the President’s exhortation was indeed within the limits of the law,Cheap Arizona Coyotes Hoodies, and should be taken seriously,Buffalo Sabres Gear, not only by defaulting MPs, but also by those others defined in the Act as persons in public life. “They had 11 years to put their houses in order, both at the level of the commission as well as those whose appointments are notified in the schedule. We need to put our house in order, and if the declaration of financial assets is fundamental…we will have to be firm on this occasion, so that 11 years later we are not in the same position.”According to Dr Luncheon, the now ruling administration was forced to repeal a 1991 Bill that sought to determine the assets of public officials.He pointed out that the Bill was designed in such a way that only the President would see the reports; that there was no provision for publication of defaulters. Those were some of the reasons,Alex Formenton Jersey, Dr Luncheon said, for the Bill to be repealed.“The administration rejected it at its birth, and we succeeded in terminating its life shortly thereafter. That Bill was repealed in its entirety. It was an unusual piece of legislation that sought to create an image that, at the end of the day, really didn’t exist. As soon as the first opportunity presented itself around where a consensus could be maintained, that Bill was repealed and the 1997 Bill was put in place.”However,2018 World Cup Russia Jerseys, the current Bill, Dr Luncheon said, provides for the Statute of Limitation of five years or more, beyond which defaulters cannot be charged or prosecuted.Responding to questions about the call made by the President last year to have the Auditor-General look into the assets of Customs officers, the Cabinet Secretary said, “It is perhaps of some concern that these legalistic considerations are being brought to the fore.”“Sometimes, one wonders how sincere is the move in the public domain by some beating their chests on the grounds of accountability and transparency and such like in the face of a patently necessary intervention for the public to be aware of the findings and for the representatives of the people to have an opportunity to examine and even take a position.”Dr Luncheon said that it is quite easy to interpret the certain actions as efforts to obscure and frustrate the thrust of the administration on bringing matters into the public domain.“Many of these “holier than thou” protesters of the President’s exhortations, in the same breath, are demanding repetitively transparency and the ending of corruption in public offices, and a very fundamental step that is embraced suddenly becomes an issue.“We need carefully to examine these machinations, and to say to those who are responsible that it does look like double-standards and it does appear as though public pronouncement of transparency and accountability are indeed being held hostage to political and other considerations.”
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-4-20 15:59 , Processed in 0.072877 second(s), 28 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表