設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 11|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

Nike Air Max 2018 Release srn3g4nh

[複製鏈接]

1萬

主題

1萬

帖子

4萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
45633
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2018-7-27 23:59:34 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
As the witness tampering case against embattled television station owner Chandra Narine Sharma continues, the proceedings took another twist yesterday when Special Prosecutor Sanjeev Datadin made an objection to the matter being heard before Magistrate Geeta Chandan-Edmond.According to the prosecutor, attorney at law Nigel Hughes who is representing Sharma is also representing the magistrate in a private matter against the Judicial Service Commission.Prosecutor Datadin yesterday told the court that there was the likelihood of the present matter becoming biased.Hughes in response to Datadin’s submissions said that it was public knowledge,Cheap NHL Jerseys, long before the Sharma case started, that he was representing the magistrate.He said at no time did he request for that matter to be sent to magistrate Chandan- Edmond, and it is the Chief Magistrate who assigns cases to the various courts.The lawyer said that this same issue arose when he had a matter before Justice William Ramlal. Hughes is presently representing the judge’s sister, Sita Ramlal, in a forgery and conspiracy case.The lawyer further told Kaieteur News that the Director of Public Prosecutions should notify him about all the lists of cases that he should recuse himself from.After a brief discussion between the lawyers and magistrate, the matter was adjourned until July 20, the day when Magistrate Chandan-Edmond has indicated that she would be making a ruling.However, a highly reliable source within the courts has told Kaieteur News that special prosecutor Datadin will not pursue his motion to have the magistrate recuse herself.Sharma along with five of his associates, including his son-in-law Ravi Mangar, were all placed on $100,000 bail by Acting Chief Magistrate Melissa Robertson after they were all charged with obstruction of justice.The matter had been delayed for over two months after the prosecution failed to commence the preliminary inquiry.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-4-25 13:09 , Processed in 0.061438 second(s), 28 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表