設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 18|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

Jerseys From China wh5ya4u0

[複製鏈接]

1萬

主題

1萬

帖子

4萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
45633
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2018-9-8 03:50:55 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
City Magistrate Ann McLennan is set to make her ruling in a drug trafficking case on Wednesday next after the defence closed its case on Thursday last, at the conclusion of a three months trial in the Georgetown Magistrates’ Court.Roger GillThe case involves a miner- Roger Gill, of 103 Carmichael Street, North Cummingsburg, who was allegedly found with 426 grams of marijuana at his stall on Merriman’s Mall. It was found in a calabash on May 8,Cheap NFL Jerseys, after the police received information and conducted a search. When the matter was called on Thursday, the Magistrate found that there was sufficient evidence against the defendant hence a prima facie case was made out.Magistrate Mc Lennon then called on the accused to lead a defence. In doing so, the defendant, after seeking advice from his Attorney, Clive Forde, gave an unsworn testimony.Gill told the court that he was innocent of the charge. He explained that on the day in question, the police searched his stall and found nothing but still arrested him, along with another person, who was subsequently released.The defendant also called a witness to testify on his behalf. The witness swore to the court that he was telling the truth and came to testify because he was present when the police searched his friend’s stall.The witness also testified that he had known the defendant for five years.Attorney Forde submitted that the charge against his client should be dismissed because the prosecution had failed to prove their case.He contended that the prosecution had failed to prove the elements of the offence and asked the court to consider that it represented doubt in the prosecution’s case against his client.On the other hand, Police Prosecutor, Corporal Deniro Jones attested that he had proven his case beyond reasonable doubt, and as such the court should find the defendant guilty as charged.Jones contested that every element of the offence was proven to indicate that Gill was indeed in control and had knowledge of the illicit substance. The Prosecutor also discredited the defence witness. Jones argued that the witness is a friend of the accused and could not be trusted.The Magistrate documented the submissions in her book of minutes and informed the parties to return to court on August 12, for decision.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-6-1 18:55 , Processed in 0.071723 second(s), 26 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表