設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 76|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

Darcy Kuemper Jersey 3bywhuw3

[複製鏈接]

3萬

主題

3萬

帖子

10萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
102747
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-1-21 15:44:38 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
– opposition demands truthPM Sam HindsFacing tough questions,Richard Dent Bears Jersey, Government yesterday made an about turn, retracting earlier statements and insisting that China Central Television (CCTV) does not need a licence to operate in Guyana; because it is utilizing a channel assigned to the state-owned National Communications Network (NCN).According to Prime Minister, Samuel Hinds, NCN is merely relaying a feed.But the Parliamentary opposition, Alliance For Change (AFC) and A Partnership For National Unity (APNU), both dismissed the explanations as being from a totally “confused” government that is now seeking to correct a gross mistake.Since the Chinese state-owned television started to broadcast less than two weeks ago on Channel 27/Cable 78, the whole issue of the granting of television and radio licences has sparked a hot debate with questions especially over the procedures followed.With the formation of statutory Guyana National Broadcasting Authority (GNBA) recently, that body has been requesting fresh applications to be submitted. Previously, the National Frequency and Management Unit (NFMU) would grant application for frequencies. With a number of applicants facing a further delay in the processing, the entire issue has been sharply drawn into the spotlight.Initially, Government said that the licence was as a result of an agreement done way back before the Jagdeo presidency. However, government later said it was checking back its record to determine what transpired in the lead up to CCTV taking the air.Head of the Presidential Secretariat, Dr. Roger Luncheon, had suggested that the National Frequency Management Unit (NFMU) would have handled the transaction.Yesterday, in explaining CCTV’s presence in Guyana, Hinds acknowledged that questions were posed in the National Assembly by AFC Member of Parliament, Cathy Hughes, recently on licensing and were to be answered by Thursday. He also noted that APNU’s Joe Harmon had attempted to raise similar questions, but was disallowed by the Speaker as it was thought they were similar to Hughes’s.He also made reference to statements of media personality,Deion Sanders Cowboys Jersey, Kit Nascimento,Ezekiel Elliott Cowboys Jersey, who has been speaking and writing about the dangerous precedent being set and about Government breaking its own laws.No licenceAFC’s Cathy Hughes“Well, Kit can put his concerns to rest:  they arise from incorrect assumptions,” the PM said.“CCTV has no licence to broadcast in Guyana.  The licensed broadcaster, National Communications Network (NCN) Inc., is relaying CCTV programmes for 18 hours or more, on one of its assigned channels.  This situation is very much similar to that which obtained when Trinity Broadcasting Network (TBN) programmes used to be relayed on one of the terrestrial television channels in Guyana. “Hinds made it clear that when TBN-relayed broadcast programmes were discontinued, it was not on the basis of TBN being a foreign programme, but rather over a dispute over who had the rights to the television channel.He said that CCTV is not broadcasting in Guyana – “it is not licensed and needs no licence.  NCN is relaying a feed from CCTV, as other TV stations relay satellite-feeds of their choice, including CNNI, BBC,Jonathan Bullard Jersey, NBC,Jaylon Smith Cowboys Jersey, CBS, and CCTV…”The PM also argued that many are not aware that NCN for a number of years, has been airing CCTV content, in addition to CNN, BBC, NBC, CBS, HBO, Al Jazeera, and Russian programmes. It is a fact also that CCTV programmes are available on various cable packages in the U.S.A. and in most countries in the world.“I, therefore, hope that it is now clear that CCTV is not, in itself, a licensed operator in Guyana.  CCTV programmes are no more foreign propaganda than any other foreign-originated programmes relayed in Guyana, whether direct to a home-receiver from a satellite, like DIREC-TV or FOX, or a re-broadcast by a licensed, terrestrial (on-the-ground) broadcaster.”The official said that the issue of CCTV coming here came up during discussions of the Guyana-China Joint Commission.“This mutual desire was eventually formalized in an Agreement between the Governments of Guyana and China, in 2004.  Under that agreement, China Radio and Television Corporation (CCTV) provides, to NCN, receiving and transmitting facilities which then become the property of NCN, after which, in negotiations on specific terms, NCN would re-broadcast specific programmes of CCTV over one of its (NCN’S) assigned channels.”Hinds said it is a business arrangement of NCN, not unlike the arrangement under which TBN was relayed in Guyana.“At that time, Channel 29/Cable 80 was earmarked to NCN for part-use in re-broadcasting CCTV programmes,Kevin White Bears Jersey, but when the Learning Channel came along in early 2011, NCN began utilizing that previously earmarked Channel for the Learning Channel.  Consequently, in 2012, when the re-broadcasts were to begin, Channel 27/Cable 78 was instead assigned as a substitute.”But both Harmon and Hughes were dismissive of the “excuse” by the PM.Suspending NCNAPNU’s Joe Harmon“This is clearly a defence by the government in damage control mode and clearly shows an inept administration which has been unable to properly handle the affairs of this government.”Harmon said that his APNU was standing by the statements of Dr. Roger Luncheon,Maliek Collins Jersey, Head of the Presidential Secretariat, who recently said that instructions were given for NFMU to issue a frequency.The MP also said that his recent questions to the National Assembly which were disallowed were based on the Broadcast Act which said that licencees have to be Guyanese or CARICOM citizens.Regarding the statements by the PM that the CCTV deal was a business one with NCN, Harmon was convinced that the statements of government are clearly confusing as the entity does not have the authority to grant frequencies…rather that is the job of the NFMU.The MP said his party is now studying the issue to determine whether NCN as a licence holder may have breached the broadcast regulations.“We will be moving to even have NCN’s licence suspended if it is found that they breached the Broadcast Act by giving out this channel.”According to AFC’s Hughes, from what Government is saying, it is clear that it gave itself three channels. “I am horrified that the state took it to grant itself three channels. The fact is, when NCN was allocated the channels, the conditions would have made it clear what they were for.”She too said that the government’s story kept changing.First, it was NCN’s head, Michael Gordon,Tony Romo Cowboys Jersey, who said that the entity’s responsibility to CCTV had to do with sanitary and maintenance. “Now we are hearing that they are broadcasting. What is the truth? We have Transport Minister Benn, Mr. Gordon,Alshon Jeffery Jersey, the Prime Minister, and Dr. Luncheon all saying different things…what is the truth?”
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-5-18 09:03 , Processed in 0.071256 second(s), 26 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表