設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 14|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

China Jerseys Authentic lblp311k

[複製鏈接]

3萬

主題

3萬

帖子

9萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
95416
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-2-14 01:36:05 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
…charged with possession of arms and ammunitionDorsette Mc Cammon who was freed in the high court in 2009 on a charge of murder stemming from the shooting death of police man Mica Cort on February 11,Cheap Baseball Jerseys, 2007,Cheap Authentic Jerseys, on Monday had a charge of robbery with violence dismissed by magistrate Adela Nagamootoo.The charge had been pending since 2005. The magistrate upheld no case submissions by defence attorney Mursaline Bacchus,Wholesale NFL Jerseys China, after the Prosecution was forced to close its case. Prosecutor,Cheap Soccer Jerseys Authentic, Inspector Satrohan Dayaram, had informed the court that they were unable to contact the main prosecution witness,Cheap NFL Wholesale Jerseys, Mark Yearwood,Wholesale Jerseys Chinese, who is also the virtual complainant in the matter.Yearwood had failed to show up on numerous occasions to testify in the matter.Attorney at law Bacchus had contended that the defence had no case to answer since the complainant had never given evidence in the matter.Mc Cammon was accused on Wednesday December 21, 2005, at Angoy’s Avenue,Wholesale Authentic NHL Jerseys, while being in company with others and armed with a gun robbed Mark Yearwood of $10,000.Also today Attorney at Law Mursaline Bacchus informed the court that he would file a motion in the High Court to have the possession of arms and ammunition charges against his client dismissed.Mr. Bacchus is contenting that his client had a charge of murder dismissed previously in the high court. He said that in that case evidence was lead regarding possession of arms and ammunition which was deemed unsatisfactorily, because the prosecution star witness in the murder case had testified that a particular policeman had taken possession of the gun used and that policeman never came to testify and at the same time another witness testified that he picked up the gun from the ground.The lawyer further said that there was conflict because the prosecution was speaking about two guns and the ballistic expert gave evidence pertaining to one gun.He is further contending that the issue of possession of a gun and ammunition was already determined.He is expected to file the motion in the high court in two weeks to prohibit the prosecution from proceeding with the case.The next court date is May 10, 2010
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-5-11 13:28 , Processed in 0.069846 second(s), 28 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表