NFL Jerseys Supply kue33wwh

micevan1l6

– as House passes no confidence vote against him “We are going to ensure that the people who presided over the last shooting will not preside over another shooting…there is no other institution in this country that can prevent this insanity, only this House can do it,” David Granger By Gary EleazarThe combined Opposition, on Monday, unanimously voted for Parliament to call on Head of State Donald Ramotar to issue Minister of Home Affairs Clement Rohee with his ‘Marching Orders’That Motion of “No Confidence” was successfully piloted by Leader of the Parliamentary Opposition, Brigadier (rtd) David Granger.The debate will also be recorded as one of the most extensive in the House in recent times with the vote finally taking place shortly after 02:00hrs in the ‘Hallowed Chambers.’The debate had commenced on Wednesday last.Prime Minister Samuel HindsClement Rohee,Cheap Rutgers Scarlet Knights Jerseys, was the subject of the debate and motion but he made the shortest presentation (just under five minutes) in his defence, where he declared that his “conscience was clear.”The Minister made it clear that he is standing behind the 166,Melvin Gordon Wisconsin Jersey,000-plus persons that voted for the People’s Progressive Party/Civic, of which he is a part.“It was 166,177 people who voted for us on this side of the House,” Rohee said.He told the House that while he has listened carefully to the charges being made by the Opposition, which have sometimes been scathing to the point of murder accusations, he would not respond to it at that forum.The Minister said that what happened in Linden resulting in the shooting deaths of three persons and numerous others injured “is a complex one.”Rohee declared that he has a lot to say but prefers to wait for the “Independent Commission of Inquiry.”He was adamant that the many views that arose during the debate “is but a microcosm” of the views from wider society.The Minister said that to lay the blame squarely at the ‘civilians” at the Ministry of Home Affairs, flies in the face of “presumption of innocence which is enshrined in the Constitution” as he plugged following due process.Clear conscienceHe said that he awaits the establishment of the Commission of Inquiry and reminded the House that, “I do so with a conscience that is clear.”“I have always executed my function without fear or favour, affection or ill will.”Even before the Minister stood in his defence, the Christian religious community was also on display trading barbs over the Linden debacle.Bishop Juan Edghill sought to condemn some of the Christian leaders in the Region 10 community who were part of the Linden protests against electricity tariff hike.Bishop Edghill who serves as the Junior Finance Minister, by way of heckling throughout his defense of Rohee, was constantly reminded of his campaign declaration as it relates to where “Jesus Christ” would cast his vote.Prime Minister, Samuel Hinds, who has also been taking significant flak for his “perceived inadequate representation” of the region,Brett Favre Southern Miss Jersey, told the House “nothing could undo those tragic events.”He noted the many meetings between the stakeholders and the Administration and believed that progress is being made.The government, he said, is committed to the international component for the Commission of Inquiry and reminded that the forum is expected to be “comprehensive in its coverage.”The Prime Minister reminded also that the Government is committed to putting on hold the increase in tariff for Linden and pointed too to the technical team proposed to review all available and practical options.Under Fire, Home Affairs Minister Clement RoheeWhile he said that the Government agrees with placing on record, condemnation for the killings and condolences for the family, he wants culpability to be determined by the Commission of Inquiry and as such reminded that the call for ‘Rohee’s head on a platter’ was premature and couldn’t be supported.Granger, who piloted the motion and had called for the vote, in his rebuttal Monday immediately reminded the Home Affair Minister that as opposed to the 166,000 persons that he was standing behind, the APNU’s demand, for which he spoke, was on the shoulders of 175,De Anthony Thomas Oregon Jersey,000-plus for APNU along with those that voted for the AFC.“We have heard the authentic testimony of eyewitnesses,LaMarcus Aldridge Texas Jersey,” said Granger and he pointed to APNU’s Morian, Kissoon and Trotman all of whom were on the bridge at the time of the shooting.Deaths not trivialThe Brigadier (rtd) was adamant that the debate was not an occasion to trivialize the deaths of “these three martyrs” and said that “this house is not a place to make jokes about these three deaths.”He slammed government speakers saying that the debate was not an opportunity for “filibuster which has been taking place.”A filibuster is defined loosely to mean a type of parliamentary procedure where an individual extends debate, allowing a lone member to delay or entirely prevent a vote on a given proposal.It is also referred to in some jurisdictions as a “talking out a bill.”He lamented the fact that the Government lined up more than a dozen speakers to the motion using dialogue as a device to delay the inevitable.“This motion is not about electricity rates…This motion is about the competence of the Minister of Home affairs.”“The killings on 18 July were not force majeure; they were not an act of God.”He sought to debunk criticisms emanating from the Government benches that the motion was premature saying that,Ricky Seals-Jones Texas A&M Jersey, in fact “if anything it has been delayed….if anything,Joe Paterno Penn Jersey, this motion is pre-emptive to prevent further mischief.”“We are going to ensure that there is justice tonight,” said Granger and warned that “we are going to ensure that the people who presided over the last shooting will not preside over another shooting…there is no other institution in this country that can prevent this insanity, only this House can do it.”Responding to those that have said that Parliament cannot remove the Minister, Granger declared that “There is no other institution in this country that can authoritatively call for, and demand the revocation of the appointment of the Minister of Home Affairs.”Granger explained that while the partnership supports the Commission of Inquiry that body should not been seen as a substitute to the revocation of the appointment of the Minister.Rattling off the list of moves that APNU will support, Granger was adamant that “we will not wait another night to stop this lawlessness in the Guyana Police Force.”