設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 37|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

Authentic NFL Jerseys Wholesale had decided to rob taxi driver Deonarine Sookde

[複製鏈接]

3萬

主題

3萬

帖子

10萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
102747
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-4-3 07:46:25 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
…accomplice cops plea dealThe first local murder trial that utilized the Plea Bargain Act of 2010 ended yesterday with accused Burt Lancaster being sentenced to death for the April 2006 murder of taxi driver Deonarine Sookdeo by Justice Dawn Gregory.Despite stringent argument and a constitutional motion by defence attorney Basil Williams,Edrice Adebayo Kentucky Jersey, the jury returned a unanimous guilty verdict after a relatively brief deliberation.Deonarine’s badly decomposed body was discovered in a remote area off the Soesdyke/Linden Highway days after he went missing.His car which was stripped of valuable parts had earlier been found in the said area.Four persons were initially charged for his murder and two were subsequently set free.The jury based their conclusion on the evidence given by star witness Daywan Kawal called ‘Avinash’ who was initially charged along with Lancaster for the taxi driver’s murder.Murder accused Daywan Kawal entered a plea bargain and turned chief witness for the state.However, Kawal pleaded guilty to the lesser count of manslaughter and received a seven year sentence in exchange for his testimony against his co-accused Lancaster called ‘Moses’.This was shortly after the Plea Bargaining Act was passed in the National Assembly.Defence counsel for Lancaster,Skal Labissiere Kentucky Jersey, Williams had earlier moved to the High Court seeking a Conservatory Order to halt his trial.Chief Justice, Ian Chang, had dismissed the application but granted Defence Counsel the right to a constitutional motion to determine whether his client’s constitutional right to a fair trial was contravened by what transpired during a plea bargain arrangement.Counsel’s contention was that his client, Burt Lancaster, and three others were charged with murder and the offence was “murder or nothing.”However,Devin Gardner Michigan Jersey, at trial,Louisville Cardinals Jerseys, his client found that during a plea bargaining arrangement, of which he was not consulted,Len Bias Maryland Jersey, two of the accused were freed, and the fourth, Kawal, was allowed to plead guilty to manslaughter.Williams had argued that Kawal, who was given a “light” sentence,Desmond Howard Michigan Jersey, had been made a witness for the State in the matter in which he was an accused.Both Kawal and Lancaster had given caution statements to the police in which they described how the taxi driver was killed.Answering cross-examination by Attorney-at-Law Williams,Memphis Tigers Jerseys, Kawal testified that he had given three statements to the prosecution — the first was given in 2006, the second on the same day,Michael Ford LSU Jersey, and the third was given in 2011 when he benefited from the plea bargaining arrangement.In his first statement,Cheap NFL Jerseys, the witness had said that he and the accused Burt Lancaster, had decided to rob taxi driver Deonarine Sookdeo, but that Lancaster was the one who had knifed Sookdeo in the belly. Kawal however admitted that there was an error in this first statement, and when asked to explain this mistake, he declared that both he and Lancaster had stabbed Sookdeo in the belly, causing him to die.Kawal admitted that the accused Lancaster, stammered horribly, making it unlikely for him to carry on a conversation in comfort; but he claimed that that does not cause Lancaster much problem.In answer to lead prosecutor Konyo Sandiford, in her examination in evidence-in-chief, Daywan Kawal revealed how he had agreed with Lancaster to rob the taxi driver and wound him with a knife.Kawal stood up well to rigorous cross examination which also centered around his motive for entering into the plea deal in exchange for a light sentence.Kawal had accepted from questions in the cross-examination that it was clear to him that the accused Lancaster would be severely dealt with, and that he was prepared to give evidence against Lancaster because of the benefit he derived from the plea bargain arrangement.Konyo Sandiford and Diana Kaulesar represented the State in the matter and they responded strongly to the closing submissions made by the defence counsel, swaying the jury in the process.During the trial, Lancaster had an opportunity to plead to the lesser count of manslaughter but he chose to bite the bullet and seek acquittal on the capital offence.When asked what he had to say before the sentence was handed down, Lancaster stuttered a bit and appeared to be pretending that he could not speak.After considering all the evidence Justice Gregory ruled that Lancaster face the gallows.It is not clear if Lancaster will appeal the verdict.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-5-18 11:52 , Processed in 0.068297 second(s), 26 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表