設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 11|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

Kyle Hendricks Cubs Jersey in favor of the PPP/C.While

[複製鏈接]

3萬

主題

3萬

帖子

10萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
102747
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-5-7 23:11:22 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
The Media Monitoring Unit (MMU) of the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM), in its most recent report,Dallas Keuchel Astros Jersey, reflected a conclusion that the incumbent People’s Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/C) has gained the most political mileage from state-owned media houses.According to the report, the National Communication Network’s (NCN) positive coverage of the PPP/C overwhelmed positive coverage of A Partnership for National Unity and Alliance For Chance (APNU+AFC) by a margin of approximately 6:1.And on the negative side, APNU+AFC gained considerably more negative coverage than the PPP/C to the tune of over 47:1.Specifically,Anthony Gose Tigers Jersey, the MMU found that a huge amount of positive coverage given by NCN’s news team to the PPP/C, resulted in a positive to negative ratio of coverage in excess of 97:1.In the Talk Shows/Interviews category, only the PPP/C and APNU+AFC attracted measurable coverage while the other parties did not. In this aspect, the MMU reported that the PPP/C gained a large allotment of positive coverage, while APNU+AFC came in for a “sprinkle.” The disparity in positive coverage that the two political parties received reflected a ratio of 17:1, in favor of the PPP/C.While, APNU+AFC came in for a large disbursement of negative publicity but the PPP/C gained a scant amount.The difference in negative coverage between the two political parties was reflected in a ratio exceeding 17:1,Nick Castellanos Tigers Jersey, in APNU+AFC’s favor.Also, the report stated that with regard to the Channel’s programming, PPP/C-friendly programmes dominated, particularly the programme, Political Scope.The MMU said that unfortunately,Carlos Lee Astros Jersey, it seems as if “they (APNU+AFC and the smaller political parties competing in the elections) are not likely to receive much, if any, positive publicity, anytime soon from the programmes produced and presented for public viewing by the Channel itself, the PPP/C or GINA.”The report stated that from the General Programmes category,Edwin Encarnacion Indians Jersey, the PPP/C gained a substantial amount of positive publicity, while APNU+AFC came in for a relatively puny disbursement. Further, MMU said that PPP/C’s positive coverage overwhelmed APNU+AFC’s positive coverage by a margin of approximately 55:1.In the negative columns, the PPP/C gained a microscopic amount of negative coverage, while it was the total opposite for APNU+AFC. The disparity in negative coverage between APNU+AFC and the PPP/C was seen in a ratio of 71:1 in favour of APNU+AFC.CHRONICLEThe MMU said that a review of editorials of the Chronicle Newspaper proved that the PPP/C gained a large appropriation of favorable coverage, while APNU+AFC did not come in for any measureable positive coverage. On the other hand, the PPP/C was the recipient of a relatively tiny amount of negative publicity, while APNU+AFC attracted a substantial amount of negative coverage.It was also noted that the PPP/C was the beneficiary of a positive to negative distribution of coverage that was reflected in a ratio of over 26:1,Brian McCann Astros Jersey, while APNU+AFC, devoid of any positive publicity, suffered net negative coverage.From the letters published in the newspaper, the MMU pointed out that the PPP/C gained a considerable amount of positive coverage, while APNU+AFC failed to attract any favorable opinions of measurable proportions. Also, the PPP/C was dusted with a small amount of negative publicity. “In fact, APNU+AFC’s negative portrayal was approximately 173 times the negative publicity calculated for the PPP/C.”“The newspaper’s Columns were the source of coverage for the PPP/C and APNU+AFC in the following way: Both the PPP/C and APNU+AFC received large amounts of positive publicity from the sentiments penned by the newspaper’s columnists. However, the PPP/C was portrayed extremely more favorable, attracting positive coverage that was almost 6 times the positive coverage calculated for APNU+AFC.”It was noted explicitly that in the General News category, the PPP/C scored the highest amount of positive coverage.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-5-19 06:43 , Processed in 0.068494 second(s), 28 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表