設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 22|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

Brassington $4M….”Dindyal at that point in time

[複製鏈接]

3萬

主題

3萬

帖子

10萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
102747
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-5-13 22:32:15 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
– Dr Luncheon says govt. looking to formalize salaries  “Strange enough they aren’t paid,” was the assertion of Head of the Presidential Secretariat, Dr Roger Luncheon, on Wednesday last, when responding to queries related to who pays the Board of Directors of Guyana Power and Light Inc. (GPL).According to Dr Luncheon, each of the board members functions ‘pro bono.’GPL’s CEO, Bharat DindyalThe Board of Directors of the power company, according to its 2011 Annual Report, constitutes its Chairman Winston Brassington, Carvil Duncan, Narvon Persaud, Desmond Mohamed, Mahender Sharma and Komal Ramnauth.Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of GPL, Bharat Dindyal, had defended the salaries paid to the ‘Board of Directors,’ but days later recanted his position, saying “the Directors I had referred to in the interview were Divisional Directors (Employees of the GPL Inc.) and not Directors of the Board.”This publication in an exclusive interview, had asked Dindyal: “There is a figure, or there is a notion that the Board of Directors receive, as the AFC likes to say, super salaries, Brassington $4M….”Dindyal at that point in time, interjected and sought to defend the fact that the “Board of Directors” as had been referred to specifically by the KN reporter, would demand ‘market rates for their services.’That article was published on June 16, with Dindyal responding in a letter on Tuesday last and published in Wednesday’s edition, where he said that he was referring to the Divisional Directors and not the Directors on the Board.He indicated also that “I can confirm that neither the Chairman of the Board of Directors nor any other member of the Board is paid for services rendered to GPL Inc.”Head of the Presidential Secretariat, Dr Luncheon told media operatives yesterday, during his post Cabinet press briefing that while the Directors are not provided with a salary or stipend, the administration is looking to change this situation.Dr Luncheon told media operatives, “I must admit that it is not strange when one considers that many Boards are similarly treated that their services are rendered pro bono.”He said that this, however, will not continue.According to Luncheon, it is not an ideal circumstance, “that is being brought to bear on the remuneration for boards.”He said as a result Cabinet embarked, during the early part of this year, on a comprehensive review of Director’s fee.This review according to Dr Luncheon has been completed. He indicated also that the administration by month-end, will be appointing a new Board of Directors across the gamut of state enterprises, “and their levels of remuneration would be identified.”Dr Luncheon said it is anticipated that the Directors to be appointed at GPL and those that are similarly serving on a pro bono status, would in the new dispensation acquire benefits/stipends as other board members would.Ultimate solutionDr Luncheon also addressed the state of play regarding the halting of the proposed tariff increase and the withheld $5.2B subsidy/capital transfer to the power company.According to the Head of the Presidential Secretariat, the ultimate solution would be a return to engaging the Opposition, “in a parliamentary intervention.”He said that there have been disingenuous arguments proffered, “about there being some other cause for the situation (with the power company).” He suggested that he would be more inclined towards the conventional and see the ultimate solution as having a link to the fundamental cause.Dr Luncheon said that President Donald Ramotar’s instruction to GPL points to a strong indication by the administration that “something may yet be done…Obviously it will have to be done at the level of Parliament.”The government spokesperson used the opportunity to disclose that engagements have been made with the Parliamentary Opposition, “and would have to continue…We all have identified what is the ultimate cause of the situation and we will have to go back to the level of the Parliamentary Opposition and sort out this matter.”
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-5-20 05:46 , Processed in 0.066344 second(s), 26 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表