設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 15|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

[遊戲] Bill.Williams noted that the Leader of APNU

[複製鏈接]

3萬

主題

3萬

帖子

10萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
102747
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-5-18 20:57:51 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
Shadow Minister of Legal Affairs, Basil Williams of the political coalition, A Partnership for National Unity has expressed that his party is willing to relinquish the provisions they had requested in the Local Government Bill which President Donald Ramotar had refused to assent to and had sent back to the Parliament on the basis of unconstitutionality.Basil WilliamsThe Attorney at Law informed however, that APNU has been unable to make this position pellucid as the Bill has not been brought to the National Assembly.The Member of Parliament made this disclosure during a press briefing held on Thursday last at its head office on Hadfield Street.The Shadow Minister reminded that the President had assented to three of the four Local Government Bills. Those assented to are the Fiscal Transfers Bill 2012, Municipal and District Councils (Amendment) Bill and the Local Government Commission Bill. The Bill not assented to, was the Local Government (Amendment) Bill.Williams noted that the Leader of APNU, Brigadier (rtd.) David Granger had written to President Donald Ramotar stating that their support from certain Bills will be withheld if he (President Ramotar) does not assent to certain Bills and operationalise the ones that were assented to.He added, “We also said that the constitution says that if you don’t assent to a Bill you must give reasons. So what has happened to those Bills that he has non-assented to and sent back? They were not brought back to the Parliament. It was supposed to be so according to the procedures and we would make an assessment of what he has said.”“We (APNU) believe that he (the President) does not have the power to decide what’s constitutional and what’s not but that aside, it has to be sent back to us.”The lawyer noted that the provision requested by the joint Opposition to the Amendment Bill was one which stated that a Minister could not have the power to take over a local democratic organ and that such power should be vested in the Local Government Commission.The APNU Member said that the coalition has no problem in relinquishing the provisions they had asked for but added, “how can we let them know our position if they don’t bring it back to the assembly?”“We had three provisions but we won’t break a lance over those provisions. We could eliminate those provisions. We are saying that the Minister should have no power to take over no local democratic organ power and it should be in the Commission but equally the Commission doesn’t need that power, so the three provisions the Government spoke to we don’t have a problem with relinquishing it.”
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-6-3 03:43 , Processed in 0.074118 second(s), 26 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表