設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 4|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

commissioners dealt with Ulric Cameron

[複製鏈接]

3萬

主題

3萬

帖子

10萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
102747
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-5-20 02:30:02 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
…commissioners see it as “taking from Peter to give to Peter”By Abena RockcliffeExecutive Director of the National Industrial and Commercial Investment Limited (NICIL) Winston Brassington yesterday appeared before members of the Linden Commission of Inquiry (COI) seeking compensation to the tune of over $204M for the destruction of what was described as an “old beat-up building.”Yesterday’s resumption of the COI into the July 18 shooting of protesters at Linden and the events that followed was focused on hearings of victims affected so that the commission may or may not recommend compensation by the Government of Guyana.The members of the Commission of the Inquiry are Justice Lensley Wolfe O.J., Mr. K.D. Knight S.C, Ms. Dana Seetahal S.C. along with Guyana’s former Court of Appeal Judge, Claudette Singh, CCH, and Justice Cecil Kennard, CCH, a former Chancellor of the Judiciary of Guyana.During the afternoon session, commissioners dealt with Ulric Cameron, Lindener and victim of the shooting, and Winston Brassington who was there representing NICIL’s building which was destroyed.Brassington told the Commission that NICIL is seeking compensation of $204.7M to replace the building that housed the Linden’s arm of NICIL and several other businesses.He provided a breakdown of how he arrived of 204.7M as he attached cost to every section of the building, such as the drawing room and washrooms.However,  Attorney at Law representing Lindeners, Basil Williams, told the commission that he fails to understand why Brassington is requesting so much for “one of the oldest buildings in the world.”Williams said that the building stood since the colonial time and was “merely fire wood.”While the Commissioners had a different issue with Brassington’s request, members unanimously failed to understand why a government-owned company would seek reimbursement from the said government.“It is like taking from Peter to give Peter – that is absurd,” said Commissioner K.D Knights.Knights, from the outset, told Brassington that he sees no point in embarking on an exercise that will be futile based on the fact that it makes no sense to let the government pay the government.However, Brassington sought to explain that NICIL is not government-owned.  He said that the government is a shareholder.Brassington told the Commissioners that he worked “long enough” in the corporate world to know that shareholders don’t own a company.Similarly, he said, the government has significant shares in NICIL but does not own it.  Brassington told the Commission that NICIL’s staffers are paid “only” from the revenue of the company and not from the consolidated fund.Further, he noted that NICIL expends monies from the consolidated fund on a special appropriation that must be approved by the National Assembly.Brassington, upon a request for clarification, told the Commission that NICIL is not constituted by an Act of parliament but it is state-owned.However, Williams was adamant when he told the Commission that NICIL is fully controlled by the Government of Guyana.He said that NICIL has been entrusted with many of Government properties and land. “I am saying and I know this for sure that company holds the assets of government.So once again, the question was asked, “Why would the government want to pay itself?”With no response there, Knights asked who else would pay this money if not the government.  At this point the once fluent Brassington started to stutter. “I, I, I don’t know that will have to be determined.”He was asked to make available to the Commission of Inquiry a copy of the agreement made between NICIL and the Government.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-5-17 10:16 , Processed in 0.068604 second(s), 26 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表