設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 12|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

[游泳] In Aid of Industry

[複製鏈接]

3萬

主題

3萬

帖子

9萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
95416
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-5-20 18:11:12 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
Chartered Accountant, Christopher Ram, in his weekly column has said that it’s ridiculous and absurd, that the financial statements of the Berbice Bridge Company Inc (BBCI) actually claim that it is exempt from, “income, corporation, property and withholding taxes.”Ram in his column this week sought to highlight the many irregularities of the Berbice Bridge Company.According to Ram, the company in its report filed this past week has ignored the question of taxes.He said that it is not clear whether the corporation tax exemption, on which the company is relying, is by virtue of the Berbice River Bridge Act or whether it is the Income Tax (In Aid of Industry) Act, which requires a tax exemption letter from the Minister of Finance.The Berbice Bridge Act does provide for “corporation tax, income tax and withholding tax” exemptions for the duration of the Concession AgreementRam explained that the Financial Administration and Audit Act, provides that tax remissions, waivers and concessions are only valid, if expressly provided for in a Tax Act or any subsidiary legislation.According to Ram, the Bridge Act is not a tax Act and it seems that concessions purported to be granted under that Act are invalid.Ram suggests that the Income Tax (In Aid of Industry) Act “seems hardly any more helpful.”He said that the act sets specific criteria which any successful applicant must satisfy, including activities that “demonstrably create new employment in infrastructure development.”Ram explained that the bridge, socially and economically beneficial as it is, cannot be said to have demonstrably created new employment.“If anything, it has displaced employment,” Ram stated. He said that while it can also be argued that the construction of the Bridge was infrastructure development but its operation is not.“The concession under the Berbice Bridge Act violates the Fiscal Administration and Audit Act and in any case does not exempt the company from Property Tax.”In respect of the Income Tax (In Aid of Industry) Act, the Bridge activity does not seem to satisfy the criteria for the exemptions.“Maybe Mr. Brassington and NICIL will engineer an amendment to the Act to accommodate BBCI, just as the Government did when it recognised that the Ramroop group was granted tax concessions which were unlawful.”
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-5-19 02:25 , Processed in 0.077536 second(s), 26 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表