設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 25|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

[游泳] Dave Robinson Packers Jersey tpsrchqv

[複製鏈接]

3萬

主題

3萬

帖子

10萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
102747
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-6-1 09:28:54 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
– “they may feel beholden to the executive”Opposition parliamentarian, Carl Greenidge,Tampa Bay Rays Matt Duffy Jersey, is of the opinion that Ian Chang and Carl Singh acting in theOpposition Parliamentarian, Carl Greenidgeposts of Chief Justice (CJ)and Chancellor respectively,Detroit Tigers Alex Avila Jersey, may have them knowingly or unwittingly making decisions which would suggest that they feel beholden to the executive, as it relates to constitutional matters before the constitutional court.He noted too that such an arrangement leaves the nation on a dangerous precipice. Chartered Accountant,Atlanta Braves Dansby Swanson Jersey, Chris Ram also holds a similar view.The Constitutional/Administrative Division of the High Court which was officially gazetted on October 1, 2011, was set up to handle certain matters which include those regarding the application or interpretation of the Constitution, alleged violations of the fundamental rights, the constitutionality of any legislative enactment etc.It was established by way of a Practice Direction issued by the Chancellor (ag.) which may suggest that it is regarded as a mere administrative arrangement rather than a substantive change in how constitutional issues are addressed judicially.Unlike the Commercial Court or the Family Court, no specific Rules of Court were prescribed for the ”Constitutional Court”. The old rules of the Supreme Court apply. The Practice Direction did not specify how many judges ought to constitute the Court or who should preside over it. But since its inception, the Chief Justice (ag.) has headed the Constitutional/Administrative Division as the sole judge, and has heard and delivered dozens of decisions on the Constitution, some of them fundamental and a few quite controversial. These are in addition to the scores of otherChartered Accountant, Chris Ramcases he handles during the course of any week, including bail applications.Asked to comment on the Division, Ram said that Guyana is fortunate to have someone like the acting incumbent Justice Ian Chang as the Judge of the Constitutional Division.He said that case reports of decisions emanating from the totality of the Supreme Court of Judicature which includes the Court of Appeal and the High Courts of Berbice,Milwaukee Brewers Travis Shaw Jersey, Demerara and Essequibo suggest that Justice Chang is by far the most productive of judges in the system.On a cautionary note, however,Cameron Maybin Jersey, Ram, who is also an attorney-at-law, said that there are concerns that the system depends so heavily on a single judge, and that while there have been commendable attempts at increasing the number of judges it will take many years for the wide gap in quality to be bridged.Regarding the acting appointments of both the Chancellor and the Chief Justice, Ram said that it is unthinkable that the framers of the Constitution intended that such high offices could be filled by acting appointees for any extended period,Norichika Aoki Jersey, let alone about nine years.The Chartered Accountant said that the Constitution allows two political persons – the President and the Leader of the Opposition – as the sole authorities on the appointments to these offices.Confirmed appointments require agreement between the President and the Leader of the Opposition, while acting appointments require meaningful consultation,Michael Bourn Jersey, a nebulous concept at best, according to Ram.He said, however, that the whole framework for the functioning and appointments to these high judicial offices needs to be reviewed, and at a minimum the Constitution should have had some tie-breaker to untangle the “Gordian knot” which faces the country over these offices.Ram concluded, “Pretending that there is no problem is to take the mythical ostrich approach and we all know how that ended.”Some seasoned lawyers commented that there is need for suitable persons to be appointed to the positions of Chief Justice and Chancellor permanently, since having persons acting for extended periods runs the risk of compromising their decisions in order to secure appointment.APNU’s Shadow Minister of Finance, Carl Greenidge, agrees implicitly. He said that the current arrangement in which the CJ and Chancellor have been acting for nearly a decade is not only unacceptable but dangerous because clearly, they both would like to be confirmed and may be “knowingly or unwittingly biased.”“In order to secure confirmation they may be tempted to facilitate the Executive and the President in particular who have such a powerful influence on their confirmation. That situation may assist the President but not the country,” Greenidge asserted.He emphasized that these posts are so critical that the persons appointed to them should command the confidence of the key stakeholders. The political parties he said, represents those stakeholders.Also on a televised Alliance For Change (AFC) programme, the party leader, Khemraj Ramjattan said that as it relates to the Judiciary, indeed the Constitution gives the President a very heavy hand in the selection of the Chancellor and the Chief Justice.He said that these positions in the hierarchy of the judiciary depend on the agreement of both Opposition leader and the President, and because they cannot agree, both have been acting in the two positions; chancellor and CJ.“My point is, we have to look at who the President can really appoint. To that extent, it gives a lot of powers to the President and one can say indeed that it is beneficial to have the opposition leader serve a role in agreeing.“However, for a number of years we have not gotten agreement. It has left a really undesirable kind of scenario whereby, we are not getting what the constitution contemplated—consensual appointments,St. Louis Cardinals Zach Duke Jersey,” Ramjattan asserted.He said, too, that there is need for some amount of reconfiguration whether it should have the opposition part of that process, or have a change in the president having this kind of executive power.“These provisions, to alter them are another big thing. You have to get a referendum and a two-thirds majority. The President might not want to do that and we won’t get to change that,Dustin McGowan Jersey,” he concluded.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-5-9 23:46 , Processed in 0.073271 second(s), 28 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表