設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 38|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

[泰拳] Jerseys From China xxymtcn5

[複製鏈接]

1萬

主題

1萬

帖子

4萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
45633
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-6-8 21:56:37 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
–    Hotel granted concessions worth millionsAny plans to sell the Marriott-branded hotel currently under construction in Kingston will have to include it being valued far in excess than the US$51M it is now reportedly costing.Chris RamA number of undisclosed concessions, including duty free allowances, have been granted in relation to the project, which in dollar terms will push the final price way above the US$51M price tag.Under the country’s investment regulations, investors can apply through the Guyana Office For Investments (Go-Invest) for special conditions, including a waiver on taxes for a specific time; duty free concessions on vehicles and building materials and a host of other benefits.Government has recently said it is the intention to sell it once it is completed.Writing in his Sunday business column in the Stabroek News, accountant/lawyer Christopher Ram argued that at first glance, the hotel whose construction is being managed by a government-owned company, would have to be valued much more than the actual amounts paid to the contractor.“And surely those concessions which Mr. (Winston) Brassington has negotiated from Go-Invest have a huge value which must be factored in any price. The selling price of the shares in the hotel should therefore exceed the actual cost giving rise to a huge profit. Of course, Director Brassington will argue, quite incorrectly, that the profit belongs to the company and can only be distributed by way of dividends.”Brassington is the head of the Atlantic Hotel Inc. (AHI), the government-owned company.He has been under fire for his handling of more than 100 transactions including privatizations and sale of state properties through the National Industrial and Commercial Investments Limited (NICIL), the parent company of AHI, which is also owned by government.Within the last decade, the administration has been steadily using NICIL to conduct investments and other privatizations that have largely found disfavour with the Opposition which now has a one-seat majority in the National Assembly, the body which has to approve how public funds are spent.However, government has been arguing that since NICIL is a company, its transactions do not have to be approved by Members of Parliament of both sides of the House.According to Ram, a harsh critic of the administration, NICIL’s tabling of its accounts may be reflecting a lower value for the hotel going up which ultimately would have implications for any investors/purchasers.“If we divert for a moment and look at the financial statements of Atlantic Hotel Inc. as at December 31, 2011, we see the flawed accounts signed by Mr Brassington and given a clean audit opinion by the Audit Office. Only the Guyana dollar equivalent of the payment to the contractor has been recorded in the accounts,” Ram said in his business column.The construction of the hotel has been running into several speed bumps since being announced by former President Bharrat Jagdeo two years ago.Winston BrassingtonIn the first place, there were questions why government was investing valuable taxpayers’ dollars in what is considered a private sector project.In late 2011, government released US$10M ($2B) to the hotel’s contractor, Shanghai Construction Group, despite no clear idea who the investors would be. To date,Kris Jenkins College Jersey, the government still has not finalized the investors. Yet billions have been poured into the project.News that only Chinese labourers were hired in the project also sparked protests and saw government coming out with a number of strange statements in its defence, such as there were no skilled labourers in Guyana to undertake a project of such magnitude; there was a language barrier and that the contractor had the discretion to hire its own labour force.Recently, there were disclosures that government went ahead and hired a New York-based engineering firm despite knowing that it had been blacklisted from participating in certain school projects in that state after a court matter that found them guilty. Its main executives were forced to resign.Brassington has said that he knew all along about the consultant’s court issues but did not indicate whether it was a problem.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-5-19 01:43 , Processed in 0.067600 second(s), 26 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表