設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 24|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

Jerseys NFL Wholesale z2khmnkf

[複製鏈接]

2958

主題

2958

帖子

9276

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
9276
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-6-9 13:36:56 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
In a few weeks’ time, the Government is set to table the 2014 National Budget but unless critical talks are held between the political parties in the National Assembly, there are likely to be problems again.Writing in his weekly column in Stabroek News, former Auditor General,Nick Castellanos Tigers Jersey, Anand Goolsarran, indicated that he hopes that there is not a repetition of what happened in 2012 and 2013 when this year’s National Budget is presented.Former Auditor General, Anand Goolsarran“It is not too late for there to be meaningful consultations with the combined Opposition so that the budget as presented will enjoy smooth passage. One looks forward to a healthy debate on the budget and not to “a fish market scene”, once described by the late Attorney General, Doodnauth Singh in his farewell speech in the National Assembly.”The budget situation has been a worrying one, since the November 2011 General and Regional Elections left the ruling administration, the People’s Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/C),cheap nfl jerseys online, without a majority for the first time since assuming continuous power from 1992.The Opposition – A Partnership for National Unity (APNU) and Alliance For Change (AFC) -promptly made cuts to the 2012 National Budget, an authority that the administration insisted that the Opposition did not have. Last year, the cuts continued. There were calls for budget talks,Chicago White Sox Jerseys, but the Opposition has been claiming that not much advancement has been made.With a few weeks remaining and the budget likely almost completed, there is the feeling that a replay is likely.According to Goolsarran, “In April 2012, I attended the budget debate, and the scene was one of outright hostility, shouting,Cheap NFL Jerseys Supply, booing and heckling. Such behavior in the highest forum of our land is unbecoming of our elected representatives and is unprecedented in my years of association with the National Assembly, first as Deputy Auditor General, then Auditor General. I have since not returned to the Assembly to listen to another debate.”Goolsarran noted that in 2012, the Assembly voted down several items of proposed expenditure where in its opinion satisfactory explanations were not provided.This prompted the Government to mount a legal challenge to the Assembly’s decision on the grounds that it was unconstitutional for the body to amend the budget as presented and the “Assembly could either approve or reject the budget, but not reduce it.”The former Auditor General said that in his preliminary ruling, the Chief Justice upheld the Government’s position but suggested that, in view of the new configuration in the Assembly and in order to overcome any disagreement,wholeslae cheap nfl jerseys china, it would be appropriate for the Minister to rework the budget instead of the assembly.“The Chief Justice did not grant any relief since the Government had amended the Appropriation Bill to reflect the reduction in the budget. The amended Bill was passed by the Assembly and assented to by the President, and therefore the Court could not invalidate such actions.” However, the Minister could withdraw sums from the Consolidated Fund to restore the budget of the Ethnic Relations Commission which is a constitutional body.“In no other situations did the Court rule that sums over and above what was contained in the Appropriation Act could be withdrawn from the Consolidated Fund to restore the budget as presented. Only an Appropriation Act can authorize the Minister to make withdrawals from the Consolidated Fund.”Goolsarran believes that the Government, apparently misinterpreting the Chief Justice’s ruling, went ahead and withdrew funds from the Consolidated Fund in an attempt to restore the original 2012 budget.“When the Government sought to regularize the expenditure, the National Assembly once again voted against certain items. The Assembly did not approve of excess expenditure totalling $571.627 million incurred in the first half of the year while for the second half of 2012, the anticipated shortfalls in expenditure totalling $1.225 billion did not find favour with the Assembly.”In relation to the latter amount, Goolsarran said the Government would have withdrawn funds from the Consolidated Fund to meet the related expenditure.“Therefore,Jim Thome Indians Jersey, the total unauthorized expenditure for 2012 would amount to $1.797 billion, a significant blemish in the history of public accountability in Guyana.”The same scenario played out in 2013.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-5-14 22:54 , Processed in 0.066091 second(s), 26 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表