設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 6|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

Diego Reyes Mexico Jersey unzmic40

[複製鏈接]

1萬

主題

1萬

帖子

4萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
48524
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-7-27 10:08:52 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
Guyana is bound to face a number of lawsuits given that the country remains in violation of theFormer Attorney General Anil Nandlallrevised Treaty of Chaguaramas.Former Attorney General,Joel Castro Pereira Jersey, (AG) and Minister of Legal Affairs, Anil Nandlall expressed this view, in light of disclosures made by the country’s current AG, Basil Williams.While addressing the National Assembly on Friday,DeAndre Yedlin Hotspur Jersey UK, Williams told the House of yet another financial obligation which the PPP administration did not honour, leaving the country in an awful state of economic disrepair.Williams said that the discovery was made during a recent visit to the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ).  The AG said that he was informed that Guyana is yet to honor its financial obligation as it relates to the outcome of a matter with the Suriname Company Rudisa Beverage Company.  The Court awarded the Suriname Company some $1.2B  (US$6M) which had been collected as an environmental tax in contravention of the Revised Treaty of Chaguaramas which requires equal treatment of products and services from all Caricom member countries.  But the PPP, two years later, never honoured the obligation.Williams also revealed that $57M which was judiciously awarded to Trinidad Cement Limited (TCL) when it won a case against the PPP government is also yet to be paid. He questioned whether the former AG (Anil Nandlall) can provide an answer as to why his government did not pay the sums.Attorney General,Basil WilliamsResponding to the allegations yesterday Nandlall issued a statement which noted that the matter between the Caribbean Court of Justice in a case filed against the State of Guyana by Rudisa Beverage Company of Suriname has been in the public domain, even as it unfolded before the court.“It boggles the mind that the Attorney General made this “discovery” by chance when I repeatedly and ad nauseam made this information public, both when the judgement was awarded, as well as on numerable times thereafter,” Nandlall stressed.The former AG noted that he sought to have the matter addressed on numerous occasions. He said that as he spoke on the matter, “I explained why,Kevin Strootman Netherland Jersey, and on what basis, this judgment was granted.”Nandlall claims that during the hearing of the case,Alphonse Areola Paris Saint-Germain Jersey, the Rudisa Company undertook before the CCJ, that were Guyana to remove from its laws, the offensive provisions, they would withdraw their case.As a result, he said that the necessary amendments to the Customs Act were tabled in the National Assembly,Guillermo Ochoa Jersey, by the then Finance Minister, Dr. Ashni Singh, on two occasions,Stefan de Vrij Jersey, but both times, the joint opposition, which held a majority in the National Assembly, voted against the amendments.Nandlall pointed out that it was, in fact Williams, Khemraj Ramjattan and Carl Greenidge, who addressed the House emphatically against the amendments, on both occasions.“In both instances,Kaka Brazil Jersey, I explained to the House that the case is pending at the CCJ, and if the amendments are not passed, judgement will be granted against Guyana. My appeals fell on deaf ears.” he added.According to Nandlall the truth is that Guyana is liable to face many more lawsuits once the country remains in violation of the revised Treaty of Chaguaramas.He said that it would therefore be prudent if the current AG could ensure that Guyana complies with its Treaty obligations, rather than engage in political ramblings on this issue.Nandlall also claims no award was made by the CCJ with regard to “the second “debt” referred to by Williams.In relation to 57 million Guyana dollars which was awarded against the State in a matter brought by Trinidad Cement Limited, the former AG explained that the only monetary order made in that matter relates to costs and it is nothing close to that amount.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-5-13 21:06 , Processed in 0.055191 second(s), 28 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表