設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 28|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

Wholesale Jerseys njn4vbyr

[複製鏈接]

3萬

主題

3萬

帖子

10萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
102747
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-8-1 17:12:21 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
Attorneys for Peter Morgan yesterday filed a reply Memorandum of Law in support of his quest for depositions to be conducted in Guyana on his behalf.The US prosecution had objected citing that Morgan had failed show unavailability or materiality through affidavits from the proposed witnesses. According to Morgan’s attorneys,Cheap NFL Jerseys Wholesale, the client has amply satisfied the requirements to warrant the foreign depositions adding that the prosecution’s challenge is without merit and the US Government provides neither legal nor factual support for its position.According to the attorneys, it is not necessary for the defense to provide more information regarding the witnesses’ unavailability.“Counsel has made good faith representations,Cheap Jerseys Online, based upon his own investigation and personal contact with the proposed witnesses,Sale NFL Jerseys, for the assertion that each of the witnesses is unavailable…Counsel has stated that all of the witnesses are beyond the court’s subpoena power and have refused to come to this jurisdiction to testify at Mr. Morgan’s trial and that two of the witnesses Vanessa Miles and Ray Urwin are also too ill to travel.”It was pointed out that what was most striking is the US Government’s claim that none of the proposed testimony is material.The attorneys added that in the government’s view, there is no merit to testimony that will provide an exculpatory explanation for many of the principal issues in the government’s case, including Peter Morgan’s role in exchanging Guyanese currency in the United States.“The proposed testimony may seem irrelevant to the government, since it contradicts its theory that Peter Morgan’s money exchange business was only drug-related…But Morgan is absolutely entitled to present his defence to the jury,Cheap Jerseys From China, the government notwithstanding.”The attorneys added that this is equally true for the testimony of Farida Kuarsingh that includes, among other things,Wholesale NFL China Jerseys, her personal knowledge of David Narine’s drug sources.“As the Narines are the government’s key witnesses who claim that Morgan supplied them with drugs, testimony that someone other than Peter Morgan supplied them with drugs is exculpatory…. Thus, Kuarsingh’s testimony will certainly be admitted as inconsistent with the prior Narine statements on a matter material to the case…. Yet,Cheap Jerseys Online, her information is also material to rebut the government’s case in chief.” Morgan’s attorneys are also arguing that his prospective witnesses are critical to the jury’s understanding of the currency exchange practices utilized by Guyanese businessmen.It was pointed out that while the US Government seeks to depend on the academic and theoretical knowledge propounded by an expert (who may never have even been to Guyana, much less operated a business there), Morgan’s prospective witnesses will testify from personal experience, including,NFL Jerseys China Cheap, significantly,Wholesale China Jerseys, their experience dealing with Morgan’s Auto Sales. “They will demonstrate that, contrary to the government’s assertions, the types of currency and financial transactions offered in the government’s case in chief are typical of,Cheap NFL Jerseys, and attributable to, regular Guyanese business activity.”The legal team condemned as absurd, the government’s “myopic” view that Morgan must have at his disposal witnesses who are willing to come to the United States or who are located here and subject to subpoena power. “The government’s illusion about nonexistent defense witnesses do not render our prospective witnesses cumulative to the defense case…the issue in this case is not whether Peter Morgan dealt with currency traders in New York City…Of course he did. The issue for trial is: why…. This can only be answered by people with personal knowledge of his activities….The attorneys also sought to lay to rest the US Government’s fears about safety and logistics in connection with depositions in Guyana, “The United States Embassy in Guyana is a large fortress-like building that, from a safety standpoint, is more than adequate…It should be noted that this case stands in a very different posture than (Shaheed Roger) Khan….There are no political overtones here, unlike Khan.US drug agents working with Trinidad authorities seized Morgan at Piarco International Airport, just days after an indictment was unsealed in a New York court charging him with three counts of drug conspiracy.Morgan was indicted November 2006 on three counts of conspiracy to import and distribute cocaine in the US.His capture in Port of Spain is reminiscent of that of businessman Roger Khan who is currently before a New York court on similar charges.Khan was also arrested in Trinidad after being deported from Suriname.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-4-24 07:15 , Processed in 0.042866 second(s), 28 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表