設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 11|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

Wholesale NFL Jerseys Online oedheae2

[複製鏈接]

1萬

主題

1萬

帖子

4萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
45633
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-9-18 14:05:47 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
Persons charged for the brazen multi-million-dollar heist at the Bel Air Park home of businessman Malcolm Panday on July 12, last, made another appearance before Chief Magistrate Priya Sewnarine-Beharry yesterday.The seven accused, Panday’s mother –in –law Chandrada Rampersaud; Hardatt Kumar, 23, of Owen Street, Kitty; ex-policeman Shawn Hinds, 40, of 552 East Ruimveldt Housing; Jermaine Mitchell, 20, of YY 15 North East La Penitence; Rabindra Seemangal, 20, of 100 Sheriff Street; Aubrey Simon, 21, of 14-14 Princes Street and Rayon Jones of Lot 2 Hardina Street, Wortmanville, all came before the magistrate to continue the matter.On the previous occasion, the prosecution had asked the court that the matter be adjourned for a later date since it wished to seek legal advice from the Director of Public Prosecutions (DDP) – information which had not reached the prosecution up to the date of the hearing. This caused the postponement of the matter once again since the file sent to the DPP had not been returned.The prosecution returned yesterday informing the court that it had received the much-needed advice to proceed in the matter. In light of this advice given by the DPP, the Prosecution told the court that it was given the go-ahead to try the case summarily.Prosecutor Lionel Harvey informed the court that the matter could be dealt with since he was now in a position to present the case. He also made requests that a date be set for statements in the matter to be filed and served since it could now be tried at the Magistrates’ Court. The charges were subsequently read to the seven accused to which they all pleaded not guilty.Of the seven accused three – Shawn Hinds, Rayon Jones and Aubrey Simon – had been granted bail by the High Court prior to yesterday’s hearing, after their lawyers had made the relevant application to the higher authority.The remaining four had been incarcerated since July 14 and had not been granted bail.  Since the matter would now be tried at the Magistrates’ Court they were able to obtain bail after the prosecution had no objections to the application – only requesting that the sum be a substantial amount, justifying their request on the magnitude of the offence.Hardatt Kumar, Jermaine Mitchell, Rabindra Seemangal and Aubrey Simon were granted bail in the sum of $1M for each offence. Two of the four, Mitchell and Seemangal, faced three charges, one more than the others granted bail, for the offence of firearm possession. The two were not granted bail for the indictable offence and thus were remanded to jail.At a previous hearing, the court was told by the prosecution that all seven persons had planned the robbery after a cousin was told by Panday’s mother-in-law about money being left in the house. She was once employed at the Panday’s home as a housekeeper before being fired. The court was told that the suspects went to the home armed with guns and proceeded to rob the occupants of the house.The majority of the accused persons,Cheap NFL Jerseys China, after reports by the robbed man had been made to the police, were apprehended in the compound of the Ocean Spray Hotel, along with one of the vehicles registered to Simon, which was towed away by the police.The prosecution before closing its argument also presented to the court a letter from the doctor of Malcolm Panday. The plaintiff was not present in the court because he had been out of the jurisdiction attending to health matters.  It was indicated that he would be present at the next hearing after being given time to attend to his health issues.The case will continue on October 20.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-5-18 02:48 , Processed in 0.074580 second(s), 26 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表