設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 2|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

Cheap China Jerseys the complaint

[複製鏈接]

3萬

主題

3萬

帖子

9萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
95416
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-10-3 22:38:18 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
Attorney- at-law James Bond yesterday learnt that the matter of damage to property which was discharged against him earlier this month before Magistrate Hazel Octive- Hamilton was reinstituted.Bond who yesterday faced Chief Magistrate Priya Sewnarine- Beharry as the defence for a client,Cheap NFL Jerseys China, was surprised to know that the matter which was reported by Adrian Wilman,wholesale nfl jerseys, the complaint, was back in court.According to Bond,Jerseys NFL Wholesale, to his knowledge, the matter against him had been dismissed and no date was given for him to return to court. He claimed that he was entirely oblivious to the fact that he was to reappear in court and that a summons had been served for him.The court informed Bond that the matter against him will be called on January 30 after police sent back the court file.On January 11 Bond faced the Court on three charges that included assault causing actual bodily harm,Jerseys From China, damage to property and threatening language.He allegedly destroyed Adrian Wilman’s property and threatened Rawle Stephens,Cheap China Jerseys, Wilman’s friend. When the parties appeared in court,Cheap Air Max 90 Men Shoes, the defendants refused to give evidence against Bond who was represented by Attorney Patrice Henry.In a surprising twist, Rawle Stephens told the court that he had never made any claims against Bond. He said he had only gone to the police station to be a witness on behalf of his friend. When he faced Magistrate Hamilton, he learnt that he was a complaint in the matter.In another surprising revelation, a police woman who had appeared to swear to the evidence presented to the court claimed that she was set up. The female rank said that she was not aware of any damage to property charge and was told by superiors to just swear to the information.The woman thereafter claimed that it would be against the law to swear to the information since she did not institute any charges. The police were told by the court to go and come again when their facts were right.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-5-15 01:05 , Processed in 0.072450 second(s), 28 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表