設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 14|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

Cheap Jerseys USA mgsequrn

[複製鏈接]

1萬

主題

1萬

帖子

4萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
45633
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-10-11 00:15:51 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
Attorney at law Basil Williams has moved to the High Court on behalf of two brothers, seeking the permanent stay of charges brought against them for manslaughter eight years ago.The move to the courts is to support the contention that the brothers right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time of the criminal charges which were instituted on May 14, 2001, has been contravened.Clayton and Dexter Reman are claiming that the failure of the DPP to afford them a fair hearing of the charge within a reasonable time amounts to a breach of article 144 of the constitution and is a breach of the process of the court.The two brothers were arrested on May 2, 2001 and detained at the Brickdam Police Station lock-ups until May 14, 2001 in relation to an allegation of murder after an affray.According to the affidavit filed in the High Court, they appeared before the then Chief Magistrate Paul Fung-a-Fat on May 14, 2001, charged with the offence and were refused bail.The matter was then adjourned to November 6, 2001.On the day of their first court appearance, one of the defendants, 30-year-old Clayton Reman who was a Lance Corporal in the Guyana Defence Force was interdicted from duty on half pay.On their next court appearance on November 6, 2001, the Preliminary Inquiry into the allegation of murder began before Magistrate Adrian Thompson.The PI was completed on August 20, 2002 and the brothers were committed to stand trial in the High Court for manslaughter at the next criminal sessions at the Demerara High Court.They were granted bail in the sum of $250,wholesale jerseys,000 pending trial.But according to the affidavit, no indictment of the offence has been preferred before any judge of the High Court at the Demerara criminal sessions by the Director of Public Prosecutions since October 2002.Seven years later, in June 2009, the matter was called before Justice William Ramlal, who was informed by the state prosecutor that the original depositions were lost and that the DPP could not prefer the indictments against the Remans.Justice Ramlal adjourned the matter to July 23.On that date, the Prosecutor again informed Justice Ramlal that he was unable to proceed since the original deposition were still not found, but that it would be ready to prefer the indictment using a copy of the depositions, on the next date. Noting certain limitations that would attend such a proceeding, the judge further adjourned the matter.In an affidavit in support of the original notice of motion, the brothers claimed that the delay in prosecuting the charge against them has severely affected their health and has caused and continues to cause them mental anguish.It has also prevented them from obtaining other suitable employment and with regards to Clayton Reman, the prospects of promotion in the Guyana Defence Force.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-5-12 19:00 , Processed in 0.102423 second(s), 36 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表