設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 9|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

Wholesale Stitched Jerseys ue4i04wz

[複製鏈接]

1萬

主題

1萬

帖子

4萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
48524
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-11-15 00:29:09 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
The real reason behind the British decision to pull the funds (G$1.6B) that was to finance the Security Sector Reform Programme (SSRP) was because the administration wanted to misuse the funds without any real oversight.This is according to People’s National Congress Reform Chief whip Lance E. Carberry during the party’s weekly press update at its headquarters, Congress Place.According to Carberry, the administration “as they have done on several previous occasions with donor funds,China NFL Jerseys, having secured the British loan in principle, sought every means to avoid their obligations and to be in a position to misuse those funds without any real oversight.”He stated that the People’s Progressive Party (PPP) ensured that the established Parliamentary Committee was restricted in its role to only receiving reports and stubbornly resisted any arrangement where the donor could verify that the funds were being spent in the manner approved. “It is evident that the British were not hood winked.”According to Carberry, contrary to the propaganda being churned out from the Office of the President, the cancellation of the fund for the security sector project by the British is the result of bad faith on the part of the Bharrat Jagdeo Administration and its failure to ensure genuine stakeholder consultation as agreed; its failure to ensure genuine Parliamentary oversight and its refusal to agree to a management model that would ensure transparency in the application of the funds by the donor.He said that his party is not surprised at the recent development and had over the last year raised questions about the delay in the release of funds by the donor.Carberry also chided the administration for what he called convenient consultations.He said that as late as October 8, last, the party reminded the nation of “the PPP/C’s 17 years of villification, non-consultation and deception” where consultation was being used as a convenience whenever the Administration finds itself in difficulty.“In that statement, the Party specifically referred to the sham consultation by the PPP on the Security Sector Reform Plan…For example,NFL Jerseys Cheap, perfunctory consultations were only evident when the crime spree and security situation reached alarming proportions with the massacre at Lusignan and Bartica. Civil society who had been hoodwinked into the belief that Jagdeo was serious soon realized that they were pawns in Jagdeo’s political game of convenience…These consultations came to an abrupt end after the PPP were able to make political mileage of the event in a Parliamentary debate.”According to Carberry, the world is now aware that President Jagdeo’s speeches to the Parliament and elsewhere about regular consultation are mere rhetoric.“The record of the PPP/C,Wholesale Stitched Jerseys, with respect to Public Consultation,Wholesale China Jerseys, has been driven and informed by the hard-core PPP commitment to the philosophy of Democratic Centralism…The result has been characterised by chicanery, bad faith,Cheap Jerseys Supply, and a contemptuous disregard for the views of the public, particularly those perceived not to share the views of the Administration.”Carberry accused the administration of resorting to a convoluted form of Public Consultation primarily to satisfy the conditionality imposed by donors or to diffuse tensions with the Opposition,Wholesale NBA Jerseys China, without any genuine commitment to the process.He added also that the methodology of the ruling administration has been to provide the public with very vague,Wholesale NFL Jerseys, fuzzy and often convoluted notification of the matter for consultation.“For example, the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP), Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS), etc, and then to mount a major Public Relations blitz while proceeding to solicit predetermined responses from selected cohorts, rather than encouraging genuine participation by the public…A poll of the public would reveal that, after several years of so-called consultation on the PRSP, most members of the public still do not know what the acronym means…The same applies to now in vogue Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS)…What does it mean?”
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-5-15 02:38 , Processed in 0.071515 second(s), 26 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表