設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 8|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

[Xbox 360] Cheap China Jerseys xphcva4o

[複製鏈接]

1萬

主題

1萬

帖子

4萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
45633
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-11-18 20:24:24 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
Concerns about the insurance of the ill-fated American registered aircraft that crashed into a Sparendaam, East Coast Demerara house on April 13 may soon be put to rest.The Guyana Civil Aviation Authority (GCAA) is trying to arrange a meeting with Sithe Global in relation to liabilities caused when the twin-engine Piper Aztec, with registration N27-FT crashed.Flashback: Labourers clearing the rubble at the crash siteThe two-man crew was on a technical survey mission for the Amaila Falls Hydropower project. Apparently, Sithe Global, responsible for managing the construction of the project, subcontracted Digital World Mapping to conduct surveys.This is according to Paula Mc Adam, GCAA’s Director of Aviation Safety Regulation, who was at the time responding to queries about a press release the regulatory body issued on the matter Thursday.According to GCAA’s press release, “Approval was given to Digital World Mapping to operate the specific aircraft to conduct a LiDar Survey for the Amaila Hydropower Project. In that approval the operator was advised that the aircraft must be insured against third party risk.“Detailed examination, based on information provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) of the USA has revealed that the insurance coverage for the aircraft did not include coverage for operations in South America. As a consequence the liability issues resulting from the aircraft crash are viewed as devolving to the charterer of the aircraft.”However, the regulatory agency did not definitively say whether the aircraft operator acted on the advice and insured the aircraft against third party risk.According to a source, no checks were made to confirm if the operator complied with GCAA’s advice and insured against third party risk. The source said that GCAA’s Air Transport Management Department did not verify if the aircraft was insured and breached protocol by not informing the Aviation Safety Regulations Department about the aircraft’s presence in Guyana’s airspace.The aircraft, just after taking off from the Ogle International Airport, crashed into Florence Tyndall’s house on April 13, last. It also burnt a section of her neighbour,NFL Cheap Jerseys China, Michelle Belle’s house. Tyndall escaped unharmed but the aircraft’s owner and pilot Pierre Angiel and his passenger Canadian Scientist Nick Dmitriev perished.Tyndall and Belle are patiently waiting for the investigations to conclude and the reconstruction of their properties to commence. Tyndall, whose house was completely destroyed, is optimistic that the “insurance company” would come forward and rebuild her house.It was only after the incident that some senior officials and Aviation Safety Regulations Department became aware of the aircraft, the source said. As such, the department was unable to carry out ramp inspection or examine the aircraft’s logbook which would have indicated the date of the last inspection.This incident has raised concerns among members of the local Aircraft Owners Association who have written to President Donald Ramotar.The Association is worried that the aircraft entered Guyana without proper due diligence being carried out by the GCAA. The letter pointed out that GCAA should not be the body conducting the investigations since it is also the subject of investigation. And the regulations provide for the President to direct the investigations.Cabinet Secretary, Dr. Roger Luncheon during his post-Cabinet press briefing Thursday at the Office of the President said that Government has been in receipt of many letters making similar observations and they would be attended to.Dr. Luncheon indicated that the letter from the Aircraft Owners’ Association may incite an engagement with the President.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-5-15 18:22 , Processed in 0.074157 second(s), 28 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表