設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 3|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

Wholesale Football Jerseys Authentic rz3vgcvc

[複製鏈接]

1萬

主題

1萬

帖子

4萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
48524
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-11-25 19:28:31 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
An undetermined number of ex-parte injunctions are granted by Judges of the High Court each year.Such an order has become a source of concern for many individuals and entities seeking litigation since whenever an ex parte injunction is granted it is based on hearing the case of one party in the matter,Jerseys NFL Wholesale, a procedure which is essentially in breach of the laws of natural justice.According to certain legal definitions, an injunction can be simply described as a judicial order that prohibits a party of litigation from beginning or continuing an act threatening or invading the legal right of another,Wholesale NFL Jerseys, or that compels a person to carry out an act.An ex parte order or injunction is granted whether prohibitive or mandatory on an application of one party without the other party (adversely affected) is heard.But the law of natural justice requires that both should be given a hearing before the court can make a ruling or determination in a matter.Attorney-at-law Edward Luckhoo, S.C explained that such an order by the court, ought to be only granted in exceptional circumstances and where the party applying for the injunction would suffer irreparable harm that cannot be compensated through damages or a settlement.For example, an ex-parte injunction should be granted in instances where a person’s possession or property is in receipt of a credible threat that the property is about to be destroyed.However, where such harm is not likely to occur unless there is clear breach of legal right,Cheap NBA Jerseys China, an ex-parte injunction should not be granted and the court ought to grant service on the other party to be heard before any order is made.Mr Luckhoo stressed that an important facet of an application for an ex parte injunction is that there must be full disclosure of all material facts, both in favour of and against applicant.If it established that there is no full disclosure of the material facts,NFL Jerseys Supply Womens, the ex parte order is discharged for that reason alone. Senior Counsel Luckhoo explained that an ex parte order is generally made until a short returnable date to give the other party are opportunity to show cause why the injunction ought not be continued.He contended that mandatory ex-parte injunctions ought not to be granted by the Court except in incomparable (extreme) circumstances.Kaieteur News has had its share of lawsuits, all of which featured a number of ex parte orders. One such instance involved former Commissioner-General of the Guyana Revenue Authority (GRA) Khurshid Sattaur.In 2014, Sattaur filed a suit against the Kaieteur News seeking in excess of $500 million in damages for what he claims was libel contained in its ‘Dem Boys Seh’ columns and news reports.Sattaur, had an ex-Parte application filed by the firm Satram and Satram. He also managed to secure an interim injunction retraining publisher Glenn Lall,Cheap Nike Air Max Shoes, editor Adam Harris and the National Media and Publishing Company Limited—named as the defendants in the action—from further writing, printing, publishing or circulating the alleged defamatory words contained in editions published between August 31 and September 23,Nike Air Force One Shoes Women, 2014.Sattaur had contended that after he initiated an investigation into the importation of two vehicles by remigrants Narootandeo and Gharbassi Brijnanan that resulted in the seizure of the two vehicles, Lall,Air Max 97 Buy Online, Harris and the newspaper began a campaign to “defame, malign, degrade and humiliate” him in the performance of his duties as Commissioner-General and in his personal life.He asked for the injunction out of fear that the newspaper would continue to be used to defame him.In that matter, Justice Sandra Kertzious granted the injunction and an in-chambers hearing was set on Sattaur’s application to determine whether the injunction would be continued until the hearing and determination of the action.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-5-15 06:06 , Processed in 0.074875 second(s), 28 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表