設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 11|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

Jose Calderon Jersey vofstpbx

[複製鏈接]

1萬

主題

1萬

帖子

4萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
45633
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-12-8 06:11:52 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
…engineer faults diverted channelThis picture clearly shows that the water is running straight, while the sluice has been constructed more to the right side of the canal. As the controversy continues between the contractor of the $154 million De Willem Sluice on the West Coast of Demerara, Roopan Ramotar, and the Ministry of Agriculture; Kaieteur News has been reliably informed by a well established engineer that the sluice was actually constructed at the wrong location.This, the engineer said, is the only reason why the $7 million revetment works are now needed.The engineer who prefers to remain anonymous told this publication that the consultant, SRKN’gineering and the contractor, Roopan Ramotar, were both instructed to construct the sluice in a certain manner so that there could be a straight water flow.However, according to the engineer, this was not done. The sluice has been constructed approximately 20 feet from the designated location where an old sluice stood.This is clearly evident, as the newly constructed sluice is not in alignment with the canal.This publication understands that during the excavation of the canal, the workers came across an old punt in the identified location for the sluice, and due to this, the consultant and the contractor took the decision to shift the location of the sluice without consulting or seeking the permission of the National Drainage and Irrigation Authority (NDIA). Contractor of the De Willem Sluice – Roopan Ramotar also called Fowl cock.The engineer explained that neither the consultant nor the contractor has anything on record to show that the NDIA approved the sluice to be shifted.“The question now is who will pay for the revetment works?” the engineer pointed out.In this regard,Cheap NFL Jerseys China, Kaieteur News was informed that the Procurement and Administration Board has been advised that the contractor and consultant should pay for the revetment works, since the fault lies at their feet and not at that of the government.However, the contractor, Roopan Ramotar, was adamant that the sluice was built at the correct location. He said that he followed the instructions of the consultant.He explained that he was never told to construct the sluice in alignment with the canal, as according to him, “water doesn’t run in a straight line.”Ramotar admitted that an old punt was found in the path during the excavation process.He also said that constructing a sluice is a technical undertaking. He said that even insurance companies do not want to provide coverage for the contractor undertaking such jobs.“These jobs are not cheap and one mistake and the contractor could lose his life’s savings,” Mr. Ramotar said. He said that contractors are often asked to deposit a sum of money, often not less than $30 million when they undertake such contracts.Recently, this publication reported that although the sluice has been in construction for some 14 months now, there was some confusion as to the stage of the works.Agriculture Minister, Robert Persaud and SRKN’gineering consultants reported that the works are substantially completed.However, this was not the view of the contractor, who had informed this newspaper, and which this publication has on record, that the works came to a halt because he was awaiting the approval from the Ministry of Finance for an additional $7 million for the revetment works. These works are being done at the site of the old sluice.In this regard, Minister Persaud when informed of this by Kaieteur News had said that he is not aware of an additional $7 million.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-5-10 10:12 , Processed in 0.070958 second(s), 28 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表