設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 5|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

NHL Jerseys Authentic

[複製鏈接]

7599

主題

7728

帖子

2萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
23577
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-12-14 19:50:45 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
Lee questioned the team on how exactly it would be harmed by losing the trademark registration.
The team denies the name is offensive. It cites the fact that high school and Little League teams on Indian reservations have used the Redskins name. It also says that, in a modern context, the name Redskins has essentially become synonymous with the football team and has its own positive association unrelated to the word's use as a description of Native Americans.
The Redskins' lawyer, Robert Raskopf, said the two cases are distinct because license plates are issued by the state, and forcing to state to print license plates with the Confederate flag is equivalent to forcing the government to adopt the Confederate group's appreciation for the flag. In contrast,Cheap NFL Jerseys Store, he said, merely issuing a trademark registration does not require the government to take a position advocating the Redskins' viewpoint.
"No one is going to forget the Redskins trademark or team if the registration is canceled," he said.
Lawyers for Native Americans who object to the Redskins' name and trademark say their case has been strengthened by the decision, which found that Texas was not required to issue specialty license plates featuring the Confederate battle flag.
A judge Tuesday heard arguments in U.S,Cheap Jerseys China. District Court on a lawsuit filed by the team seeking to preserve its trademark registration for the Redskins name,Cheap NFL Jerseys China Wholesale. Last year the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ruled that the team's trademark registration should be canceled on the grounds that it may be offensive to Native Americans.
U.S. District Judge Gerald Bruce Lee, who will decide the case,Discount NFL Jerseys, asked lawyers at the start of the hearing to focus on how that Supreme Court case affects the Redskins' case.
Raskopf countered that "trademark registration is a staple of brand management" in the modern era and that no corporation today would pursue a brand development strategy without a trademark registration.
Lawyers for the Native Americans say there is a 40-year history of tribal leaders and activists objecting to the Redskins name. They also cite the dictionary: Many editions,Jerseys NFL Wholesale, though not all, have described the word as pejorative for many decades.
ALEXANDRIA, Va. (AP) — A U.S. Supreme Court ruling last week on license plates and the Confederate flag could be bad news for the Washington Redskins.
The Justice Department has also intervened in the case on the side of the Native Americans. The intervention was prompted by the team challenging the constitutionality of the law that requires trademark examiners to evaluate whether a trademark is disparaging.
Besides all the narrow legal questions, Lee also heard arguments on the fundamental substantive question in the case: whether the Redskins name is in fact offensive. More specifically, the judge must evaluate whether the name was offensive to Native Americans back in the 1970s and '80s, when the mark was last registered.
Lee will issue a written ruling at a later date. He can rule for either side or he can determine that the case should be decided at a formal bench trial later this year.
Jeff Lopez, lawyer for the Native Americans, said their case has been boosted because the high court ruled that Texas was not infringing on the free speech rights of a Confederate heritage group by rejecting a special interest license plate design that shows the Confederate flag. Similarly,Jerseys From China, he argued, the federal government is not infringing on the Redskins' free speech rights just by denying them the protection of a federal trademark.
The team has argued in court papers that losing its trademark protections infringes upon its free speech rights. Lawyers for the Native Americans say the case has nothing to do with free speech. The Redskins are free to use the name even if they lose the trademark battle; they just lose some of the legal protections that go along with a registered trademark.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-5-19 19:39 , Processed in 0.063274 second(s), 26 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表