請選擇 進入手機版 | 繼續訪問電腦版
設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 17|回復: 0

NHL Jerseys Authentic which indeed could be a very small figure

[複製鏈接]

3萬

主題

3萬

帖子

9萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
95416
發表於 2017-12-15 17:23:38 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
Queens Atlantic Investment Inc. (QAII) yesterday said that it has initiated libel action against Kaieteur News for what it said was a series of misleading articles in recent weeks over the operations of the business entity.Dr Ranjisinghi Ramroop, the best friend of former President Bharrat Jagdeo, is the head of QAII.The company said that it has noted with consternation the recent attacks by Kaieteur News on the reputation, management and operation of the group.“It is clear that the imputations, inferences and conclusions drawn are not only false, erroneous, malicious and misleading but are deliberately calculated to disparage and bring into disrepute the Company’s reputation,2014 Olympic Team USA #44 Brooks Orpik White Stitched NHL Jersey, goodwill and integrity,” the company stated.QAII said it is merely a holding company and has no operating revenues of its own.  It said VAT that amounts to hundreds of millions of dollars is being collected and paid by its subsidiaries.The company claimed that the VAT expense of $38,647 as reported is not the Input, Output,Wholesale Jerseys, and also not the Net.  Rather, it represents VAT not refunded or disallowed by the GRA on some expenses so this in turn legitimately became the company’s cost.QAII stated that input VAT collected through revenues is offset against Output VAT from expenditure and the NET, which indeed could be a very small figure, is paid or reclaimed as a refund.“To juxtapose a correlation between $38,000 VAT paid with the size or worth of the Company is therefore baseless,Cheap Adidas NHL Jerseys, illogical,Wholesale China Jerseys, and ludicrous,wholesale nfl jerseys,” the company stated.QAII also stated that at no point in time did the Government ever spend or contribute any monies towards the removal of asbestos from the compound or execute any other restorative or expansion works.At the time of acquisition of the Sanata Complex in June 2007 by QAII, the entire Complex was in a state of disrepair, the company stated.“To otherwise suggest that taxpayers’ money in the sum of $400M was spent on removal of asbestos or fixing the property prior to leasing it to QAII,Jerseys China, is inaccurate, irresponsible, misconceived, and a gross misrepresentation of the facts,” QAII said in a statement.The Government of Guyana in 2008 approved the privatization of the Sanata Textiles Complex (Sanata), Industrial Site, Georgetown to QAII for the purpose of establishing a multi-purpose investment complex.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-4-16 12:15 , Processed in 0.081005 second(s), 25 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表