設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 8|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

NFL Jerseys Authentic China 25

[複製鏈接]

3萬

主題

3萬

帖子

10萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
102747
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-12-16 05:35:35 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
A father and son combination who were on trial for a murder committed in 2002 will have to face a judge and jury again.This was after a mixed jury panel failed yesterday to arrive at a unanimous verdict on the offence of murder against Roy Pestano Sr., 60, and his son Raymond Pestano,Cheap Jerseys Online, 36, of Number 41 Village, West Coast Berbice. The two men are accused of killing fellow villager Davanand Ramlagan, 25, on October 19, 2002.The men were on trial before Justice Navindra Singh and a mixed Jury in the Berbice High Court.The incident is alleged to have been committed at the Breezy Point shop, Number 41 Village, West Coast Berbice.The jury retired around 14:30 hrs after deliberating for more than three and a half hours. The forewoman, when asked, stated that they were unable to arrive at a unanimous verdict of murder against Raymond Pestano – the verdict being 10-2.She also stated that they were unable to arrive at a unanimous verdict with respect to Roy Pestano. That verdict was 9-3.As such, Justice Singh told the two defendants that they will have to be remanded to prison and face a judge and jury again at the next sitting of the Berbice Criminal assizes.Earlier, defence attorney Senior Counsel,Cheap Nike NFL Jerseys China, Bernard De Santos and state prosecutor, Judith Gildharie-Mursalin had addressed the jury.In his address,Cheap NHL Jerseys Online, Senior Counsel De Santos urged the jury not to believe the prosecution’s story and drew reference to some inconsistencies in their case.The state prosecutor in a passionate address to the jury,Wholesale Jerseys From China, recounted the prosecution’s case,Wholesale Jerseys 2018, which she said was “as clear as day”. She focused on the evidence presented and asked the jury not to draw sympathy for anyone. The Prosecutor implored the jury to look at the case in totality and mentioned that the accused were equally guilty.“It was the father who encouraged his sons to kill, shoot up and jook up. It was the father who held the deceased’s hands behind his back and then asked his sons if ‘y’all give he enough.”In her opening address, Prosecutor Judith Mursalin had recounted the October 19, 2002 incident in which she had stated that around 21.30 hrs, Kenrick Ramlagan and his cousin Joel Ross were at the Breezy Point shop in No.41 village when the two accused  drove up in a white car with Roy Pestano Jr. An altercation took place and Davanand Ramlagan was injured and left lying in a pool of blood.Following investigations, Roy Pestano Sr and his sons Raymond and Roy jr. were arrested and charged with the capital offence. They were tried earlier by Magistrate Kumar Doorsammy at the Weldaad Magistrate’s Court and the matter was discharged.However the men were ordered rearrested, and a new Preliminary Inquiry was held under Magistrate Roby Benn, but by then Roy Pestano Jr had fled the jurisdiction. They were committed to stand trial in December 2011.During the trial,cheap jerseys authentic, a number of witnesses were called including Joel Richard Ross, a cousin of the deceased.Also giving evidence were police Detective corporals Juke Jacques and Dharmendra Indarpaul .Government Pathologist, Dr Nehaul Singh who did the post mortem stated that there were four wounds on the body, – two stabbing and two slashing. The throat was almost severed.Defence attorney De Santos had made no case submissions which were overruled by Justice Singh who called on the two accused to lead a defence.The men had given unsworn statements from the dock in which they denied injuring Ramlagan. They said they were on speaking terms with the accused and had had no reason to injure him. They also denied that they were in any white car at Breezy Point on the night in question.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-4-20 21:33 , Processed in 0.060872 second(s), 26 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表