設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 9|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

Wholesale NFL Jerseys

[複製鏈接]

7599

主題

7728

帖子

2萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
23577
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-12-17 09:34:57 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
The Chargers say they will respect whatever the owners decide.
The missed deadline is a reminder of the wide gulf and acrimony between the city and team. Negotiations collapsed in June after only three meetings, and neither side suggests they will resume soon.
"We stay engaged, but it's hard to make a deal when you're at the table by yourself,Wholesale MLB Jerseys 2018," he said.
The city insists the team refuses to engage, which Chargers special counsel Mark Fabiani said was a narrative spun by "politicians looking to cover their own backsides." Fabiani likened the city's proposals to curdled milk because they look worse with age.
The team contends that the city's plan to build a venue at the site of the team's existing home at the aging Qualcomm Stadium is deeply flawed. Fabiani said the Chargers worked 14 years on a new stadium in San Diego and that the city has tried only eight months, spending some of that time on a mayor-appointed task force that the team questioned from the start.
The city produced its 848-page draft environmental review in August, an unusually fast turnaround.
"If that's your foundation, then nothing will ever happen," Fabiani told a group of civic leaders Friday.
The Chargers and Oakland Raiders plan to jointly build a $1.7 billion stadium in the Los Angeles suburb of Carson, one of two proposals to bring the NFL to the nation's second-largest metropolitan area. St. Louis Rams owner Stan Kroenke is part of a group planning to build a nearly $2 billion stadium in the city of Inglewood.

Faulconer remained committed to a public vote if the two sides ever strike a deal,China NFL Jerseys, saying Friday that an election could be held next year in June or November. But Fabiani ruled out Chargers support for any proposal predicated on the same environmental review.
San Diego plans to make its case directly to NFL owners next month in New York. A move to Los Angeles would require approval of 24 of the 32 owners.
In May, the task force proposed a $1.1 billion stadium that includes contributions of $121 million each from the city and San Diego County. Negotiations stalled over a review required under the California Environmental Quality Act to address impacts including noise and traffic,Wholesale Jerseys China, which the Chargers say won't survive lengthy legal challenges.
"We made it very clear that we wanted to achieve a special election, and (Friday) was the date we had to do that,Cheap Wholesale Jerseys," Faulconer said. "The Chargers chose — that was their decision — not to engage in discussion. They broke them off some time ago. That has not deterred us."
"The quickie (environmental impact report) is more like curdled milk, which looks worse the longer it sits around,Cheap Jerseys China," Fabiani said in email Thursday. "In short, the Chargers are unwilling to go along with the city's ill-conceived legal strategies."
Councilman Todd Gloria, who parted with the mayor on spending $2.1 million for the accelerated environmental review without the Chargers' support, said the team's future was largely outside the city's control.
SAN DIEGO (AP) — To no one's surprise, the city of San Diego and the Chargers missed a deadline set by Mayor Kevin Faulconer to agree on a new stadium that would keep the team from moving to Los Angeles.
The city and team had to strike a stadium deal by Friday to allow enough time for a measure to be put to voters on a Jan. 12 ballot. Faulconer wanted an election before an anticipated decision by league owners, potentially early next year,Cheap NFL Jerseys China, on whether to return a team to Los Angeles after a two-decade absence.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-5-6 01:15 , Processed in 0.078733 second(s), 26 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表