設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 5|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

[Wii] Wholesale Cheap Jerseys zsio2rbh

[複製鏈接]

1萬

主題

1萬

帖子

4萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
45633
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-12-21 05:33:17 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
-insists that the law provides for Technocrat MinistersPresident David Granger has described as “regrettable” the move by outgoing Chief Justice (Ag) Ian Chang toPresident David Granger speaking to media operatives yesterday.rule in favour of the People’s Progressive Party (PPP) that Minister of Citizenship, Winston Felix and Minister within the Ministry of Social Protection, Keith Scott,Wholesale Stitched Jerseys, cannot sit in the National Assembly as technocrats.The move, though not illegal, has been deemed unorthodox by some individuals since it required Chang taking a break from his pre-retirement leave to make the ruling.Chang ruled that by virtue of their status as elected members of the National Assembly, Felix and Scott cannot sit in Parliament as Technocrat Ministers.But according to President Granger, yesterday, Government will challenge the ruling of the acting Chief Justice.  He said, “It is rather regrettable that the Chief Justice would come out of his leave to issue such an order.”Although unable to speak precisely on the status of Government’s legal challenge, President Granger speculated yesterday that proceedings ought to have been filed by now by Attorney General, Basil Williams.In the interim, though, President Granger said that Government will abide by Chang’s ruling. “We had consultations and Speaker of the National Assembly, (Barton Scotland) is aware of our views, but we will operate within the law.”Convinced that Government is within its right to challenge the ruling, the Head of State stressed, “We are convinced that we are correct… There is precedent; there have been many from 1966. There have been Technocrat Ministers; the law provides for it and I was very astonished at Justice Chang’s ruling but we will challenge the ruling and you will hear from us,” President Granger said.The PPP had objected to the appointment of Felix and Scott as Technocrat (expert or skilled in their field) Members of the National Assembly following the APNU+AFC ascension to office after the May 11, 2015 General and Regional Elections.The party, via a statement, had contended that “Articles 103 (3) and 105 of the Constitution and Laws pronouncing on the eligibility of appointment of Technocrat Ministers, do not confer Technocrat status on these persons already sworn in by President Granger as Ministers.”The matter was filed by PPP member, Desmond Morian. The application cited Articles 60, 103, 105, 160 and 232 of the Constitution of the Cooperative Republic of Guyana, Chapter 1:01.He contended that the names of the two Ministers were not extracted from the coalition’s list of candidates hence they did not fit the criteria for the positions.Morian essentially sought a declaration from the court barring the two members of Government from sitting in the National Assembly as Technocrat Ministers.The applicant was represented by Attorney at Law, Anil Nandlall. Attorney General, Mr. Basil Williams, and the Speaker of the National Assembly, Dr. Barton Scotland, were named as respondents.In the 15-page ruling, the Chief Justice outlined that the Court sees it fit to grant Morian the application on the basis that Felix and Scott are elected members of the National Assembly but despite that status, they do not hold seats and cannot sit in Parliament as Technocrat Ministers since their names were not extracted from the APNU /AFC list of successful candidates.Additionally, Chang granted a declaration that Article 105 of the Constitution has no application to elected members of the National Assembly, that is, persons whose names were on the successful list of candidates.Chang also noted that despite their appointment by the President to be executive members of the Government, such an executive appointment does not entitle Felix and Scott to hold seats or sit as Technocrat Ministers.Morian and his Attorney, Nandlall, were present at the hearing. Attorney Prithima Kissoon appeared on behalf of the Attorney General.In an invited commented Nandlall asserted that the ruling represents the incompetence of the present administration.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-6-10 06:34 , Processed in 0.073579 second(s), 28 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表