設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 8|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

Authentic Jerseys Cheap unpn0uxp

[複製鏈接]

1萬

主題

1萬

帖子

4萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
48524
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-12-29 18:48:38 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
The long awaited Former Presidents (Benefits and other Facilities) Bill was yesterday approved in the National Assembly with only principled support from the two main opposition parties,Cheap NFL Jerseys, namely the Alliance for Change (AFC) and the People’s National Congress Reform.The Bill, which was first read on April 9, last,NFL Jerseys Supply, was presented by Finance Minister Dr Ashni Singh. It seeks to spell out what benefits any former President of Guyana will be entitled when demitting office.Under the proposed legislation,jerseys from china, a former President will receive payment in respect of the expenses incurred in the provision and use of water; electricity and telephone services at the place of residence in Guyana; services of personal and household staff, including an attendant and a gardener; services of clerical and technical staff, if requested; free medical attendance and medical treatment or reimbursement of medical expenses incurred by him for the medical attendance or treatment of himself and the dependant members of his family; full-time personal security and services of the Presidential Guard Service at the place of residence; the provision of motor vehicles owned and maintained by the State; toll free road transportation in Guyana; an annual vacation allowance equivalent to the cost of two first class return airfares provided on the same basis as that granted to serving members of the Judiciary; and a tax exemption status identical to that enjoyed by a serving President.When the Minister presented the Bill for the second reading in the House yesterday, Dr Singh said that in the past former presidents were in receipt of their entitled benefits but it was done so with the latitude of the administration and the government in its commitment to transparency was moving toward a “statute based approach”.He noted that benefits will now be paid using a structured framework and would remove the need for the use of discretionary powers by the administration.Leading off the opposition arguments on the Bill was Shadow Finance Minister and PNCR front bencher,NFL Jerseys China, Winston Murray, who said that his party welcomed the move by the government to have a statute-based approach whilst commending the move away from the use of discretionary latitude. He said that when latitude is used it is often dangled as a “carrot or stick.”Murray did take umbrage to the statement of removing discretion when there was no specificity in the Bill such as how many cars the President will use; how much support staff and the tax exemption status to be extended when all of that would be subject to make regulations order giving effect to the provisions of this Act by the Minister.Murray argued that his party’s move to have a proper consensus Bill before coming to the House was rebuffed and suggested in vain that the Bill be subject to a select committee so that the specifics could be worked out. Murray also questioned whether the President had anything to do with the Bill and was afraid of the discretionary latitude and is as such securing his benefits through a statute base approach.“I don’t blame him. He is wise. It shows that he is aware of the risk and uncertainty.”He noted also that another touchy section of the Bill was the tax exemption identical to that of a sitting president.According to Murray, the income of a sitting president was tax free. “If he goes into a business and makes millions, is that going to be tax free?”Murray posited that all income for former presidents except his/her pension should be taxable.Alliance for Change Chairman,Cheap Jerseys Wholesale, Khemraj Ramjattan was merciless in his onslaught of the Bill’s largesque nature but conceded that former presidents must be allowed when demitting office to live a life reflective of that fact.He noted,Cheap NFL Football Jerseys, however, that when laws are passed it must be certain,China NFL Jerseys, clear and specific and not as vague as the one that was before the House.According to Ramjattan, the Bill that was before the House was a far cry from the original teachings of the party, which was to work hard and struggle for the betterment of the people and not the perks of the office.Among some of the other speakers on the Bill were Aubrey Norton and Lance Carberry of the PNCR and Everall Franklin of the Guyana Action Party.The House also approved the Office of the Spouse of the President Legislation.The Office of the Spouse of the President Bill establishes an official public office for whoever is the spouse of the sitting president.In the event that the sitting president is a man, then it will be referred to as the Office of the First Lady.“The Office of the Spouse of the President shall be held by the spouse of a serving President and its tenure shall be co-terminus with that of the serving President.”Under the legislation, the Finance Minister will be responsible for the determination of allowances and other benefits to which the holder of the Office of the Spouse of the President will require in discharging public functions.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-5-6 22:52 , Processed in 0.074555 second(s), 28 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表