設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 18|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

Cheap NFL Jerseys China mzovwnt4

[複製鏈接]

1萬

主題

1萬

帖子

4萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
45633
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2018-6-20 09:45:23 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
Former Major General of the Guyana Defence Force, Norman Mc Lean and former Registrar of the High Court Sita Ramlal had a forgery charge against them dismissed yesterday by Magistrate Fazil Azeez at the Georgetown Magistrates’ Court.The Magistrate however suggested to Prosecutor Assistant Police Superintendent, Denise Griffith that she should seek advice on whether to proceed with three other related charges. Griffith is expected to return to court on September 5 for a report.Ramlal and Mc Lean were charged in 2009 for allegedly forging adoption papers.Yesterday Magistrate Azeez cited reasons for his dismissal of the case. According to the magistrate there was insufficient evidence provided to the court to prove that there was a conspiracy involving the defendants.The court was forced to uphold no case submissions by the lawyers for the two defendants.The preliminary inquiry lasted almost two years, with 15 witnesses being called to give evidence.Yesterday, as the matter was dismissed, all of the lawyers who represented the two were present in court. This included Nigel Hughes, Senior Counsel Rex Mc Kay, Edward Luckhoo and Keith Massiah,Wholesale Authentic Jerseys, among others.The prosecution was contending that Mc Lean on February 17, 2005, with intent to defraud, presented a forged Process of Court of Justice (an adoption order) in respect of a child, dated December 14, 2004, knowing same to be forged.Further it was alleged that Mc Lean on February 17, 2005 with the intent to defraud, delivered a forged adoption order in respect of the same child, dated December 14, 2004.Both Mc Lean and Ramlal were charged with conspiracy to commit a felony.It was alleged that the two defendants between December 10, 2004 and March 18, 2009, with the intent to defraud, conspired with each other to forge a judicial document in respect to the child, purporting to show that the said adoption order was done on December 14, 2000.It was also alleged that the same defendants between December 10, 2004 and March 18, 2009 with the intent to defraud, conspired with each other to forge a judicial document in respect to the same child, purporting to show that the said adoption order was caused on December 10, 2001, knowing same to be false.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-4-27 00:37 , Processed in 0.073707 second(s), 28 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表