設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 13|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

Nike Roshe Run For Cheap from 2005

[複製鏈接]

3萬

主題

3萬

帖子

9萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
95416
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2018-7-26 06:00:57 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
–    no audited reports for property since 2006By Zena Henry The Executive Director of the National Industrial and Commercial Investments Limited (NICIL), Winston Brassington, yesterday made claims for losses for the NICIL-owned Linmine Secretariat, formerly owned by the Guyana Bauxite Company.NICIL,Air Max Zero Be True, the entity that conducts commercial activity on behalf of the state, presented an inventory to the Commission of Inquiry (COI), listing items that were damaged in Linden some time on July 18, last, when unrest erupted over the hike in electricity tariffs and the subsequent shooting and killing of three protestors.Brassington testified that LINMINE was the property of NICIL. He presented a Vesting Order and a Transport on behalf of NICIL to prove that the Bauxite Company was property of the state-owned NICIL. He however failed to present the documents of incorporation,Andreas Borgman Jersey, but clarified that he could make same available.Winston Brassington being sworn inThe CEO later testified that from 2006, there has been no audited report that would disclose ownership of LINMINE. According to Brassington, from 2005, there had been a total value attached to the fixed assets of LINMINE in the audited reports, but the property itself had not been described in the financial statements (a total value is however given for the immovable property).Brassington continued when questioned that after 2006, this information was not repeated in the successive years of audited reports up to 2012.The CEO informed that all the audited reports had not been issued, but agreed that up to 2006 the property was captured in the audited reports. Following 2006, Brassington agreed with attorney at law Nigel Hughes,Nike Air Force One Shoes Women, that there is no other audited report disclosing the ownership of the LINMINE.The NICIL head also agreed that the transport provided to the COI did not reflect the company name, NICIL. It instead reflected the name of LINMINE’s former owner the “Guyana Bauxite Company” in 1973.That information Attorney-at-law Basil Williams had earlier argued was not enough to prove that NICIL was the owner of the LINMINE. He also argued that NICIL had listed items such as water dispenser, micro-wave, fridge, cabinets and other items,Alexis Sanchez Jersey, but did not list the immovable assets.In making value claims, Williams said that the items should be clearly listed. Nothing, according to the lawyer, was made clear by NICIL to highlight specifically what is being claimed.Williams argued that NICIL has to satisfy the COI of liabilities before going to an assessor claiming losses.  The COI, he claimed, must be satisfied of the property in question’s owner before damages could be assessed. That, he opined, could not be done given that inclusive evidence was not presented showing that NICIL owns LINMINE.Hughes asked Brassington about insurance for the LINMINE Secretariat and he, Brassington, revealed that the property in Linden was not insured. He said that Linden was excluded from insurance coverage.It was also disclosed that NICIL, via its CEO, has no evidence as to how the fire at LINMINE started.After Brassington’s testimony,Nike Air Max Zero White, three persons were called to the stand on issue of damage to their personal properties. Vishnu Singh,Chile Soccer Jersey, an auto dealer from East Bank Demerara said his fuel tanker was destroyed during the unrest in Linden. He claimed that the truck was returning to the city after dropping off fuel in the interior when it was destroyed by fire in Linden.He said that he was not there but that the driver of his truck told him that protestors had torched the vehicle.Carlton Mohan said that his truck and trailer fetching logs were destroyed in Linden. He said that he was also told by the driver of his truck that protestors had lit the truck afire and had used the logs to block roadways.Mohan however told the commission that he did not go to his insurer; Hand in Hand Insurance Company. He said that he instead went to Freedom House where the Prime Minister told him that it made no sense going to the insurance company since they do not cover protesting.“He said it did not make sense I go but he seh I could still go.” Mohan said he did not present the insurance claim to the Prime Minister.Mohan up to yesterday had still not gone to his insurer having known the fate of his truck since July 18. The Commission urged the truck owner to make contact with his insurer.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-4-26 09:13 , Processed in 0.064765 second(s), 28 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表