設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 5|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

 Hewitt immediately chimes in

[複製鏈接]

3萬

主題

3萬

帖子

10萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
102747
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-5-11 09:06:24 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
Author makes convincing case against US PresidentBy Dr Glenville Ashby[email protected]Huge Hewitt – a savvy attorney and talk show host, uses an artful combination of glib, rhetoric, and legal accoutrements to argue against President Barack Obama’s reelection. That he is compelling is an understatement. Hewitt is a clean fighter, relentlessly presenting point after point in a fashion devoid of ruthless and personalized partisanship.Glenville AshbyFor sure, he has well earned his credentials.  This in no way suggests a lopsided oratorical victory, but admittedly his case is so well articulated, that it will leave the most consummate of Obama’s apologists second guessing.Four years after assuming the presidency, Obama has not been able to deliver on a myriad of promises, writes Hewitt. Throughout, the author uses Obama’s words – as senator and president – to indict him. Unemployment numbers remain high, dependency on foreign oil still bedevils the nation, the deficit has soared, credit has dried up, and Solyndra, a renewable energy venture, backed by the Obama administration, with half a billion of tax payer dollars, simply evaporated.Big government and taxation as the panacea for an ailing economy is doomed. What has the nation to show for the president’s Stimulus Package (American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan)? Where has the money gone? This is vintage Hewitt. Add the politically charged Obamacare to the mix, and the president’s detractors teeter on irrationality and obduracy.  But unlike most conservative pundits, Hewitt remains measured, while loyal to his ilk.Arguably, the author’s economic diagnosis is skewed, but his strongest argument surprisingly rests in his criticism of the president’s foreign policy, despite its many successes against the Al Qaeda network. Hewitt ignores the hyper risky undertaking to bring down bin Laden where a single error spelled political suicide. Instead, he concentrates on the withdrawal of US troops in Iraq that shifts the balance of power in favour of Iran. Touting American exceptionalism, he begs the question: What has the United States gained from sacrificing its blood and resources?Hewitt ventures even further, assailing the President for more than just Iraq. Obama’s handling of the Arab Spring, and his “lead from behind” approach are said to be inconsistent with the political realism of a super power. It is this dithering leadership that infuriates Hewitt. Appeasement is the cornerstone of Obama’s foreign policy, he posits.  The author is unforgiving, hammering the president for not capitalizing on the Green Revolution in Iran; for his placid approach to the belligerent North Koreans; and for his failure to robustly respond to the military advancement and economic reach of China.But Hewitt’s foreign policy approach, with all its bleeding sincerity and “shoot from the hip” posturing could be anachronistic.  Maybe Obama’s constructivism is the modern approach to solving global problems. Perchance, unilateralism and the big stick policy of yesteryear no longer have a place in the contemporary world. Some may argue that while Obama sees the nuances and vicissitudes of world affairs, the author is mired in a Cold War mentality – an uncompromising display of authoritative self-righteousness.One thing is certain, though, and it is a position Hewitt articulates throughout. Unless the US can shake free from its moribund economic state, its global influence will wane. The reader is reminded of the president’s words: ”I found the deficit when I showed up. I found this national debt doubled, wrapped in a big bow waiting for me when I stepped in to the Oval Office.”Hewitt retorts, deftly using the words of Wall Street Journal’s Michael Boskin: “The president constantly reminds us that he was dealt a difficult hand. But the evidence is overwhelming that he played it poorly.”And as if that were not enough, Hewitt immediately chimes in: “Regardless of who steps into the Oval Office in 2013, the size of the government’s deficits poses a greater threat to the US economic stability than it did in 2008. It is vast, staggering, and deeply destructive to the nation’s future.Dr Glenville Ashby is New York based literary criticThe Brief Against Obama: The Rise, Fall and Epic Fail of the Hope and Change PresidentHachette Book Group, New York, NY, 2012ISBN: 9781455516308Available: Amazon.comRatings: ***: Recommended
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-4-29 00:08 , Processed in 0.106630 second(s), 28 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表