設為首頁收藏本站

A-Plus互動討論區

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

Login

免註冊即享有會員功能

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 12|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

Ernie Stautner Steelers Jersey ztaceptx

[複製鏈接]

3萬

主題

3萬

帖子

9萬

積分

論壇元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

積分
95416
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-6-12 18:34:57 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
分享到: 更多
… govt. to discuss escalating costs with contractorMinister David PattersonGovernment has suspended the US$150M Timehri airport project,Artie Burns Steelers Jersey UK, summoning principals of the Contractor from China to discuss the escalating costs.Confirming that China Harbour Engineering Company Limited (CHEC) was instructed to halt work last week, Minister of Public Infrastructure,Mohamed Sanu Sr Falcons Jersey UK, David Patterson,Joe Gilliam Steelers Jersey UK, was yesterday confident that the matter could be resolved amicably with normalcy expected within a week, if all goes well.CHEC has reportedly filed claims for some US$46M for works done. Such costs would put the runway extension at US$120M.According to the original contract signed between the Government of Guyana and CHEC back in 2011,Brian Poole Falcons Jersey UK, the runway extension by just over 1,Terry Bradshaw Steelers Jersey UK,000 meters was pegged at US$58M.The David Granger administration since taking office in May,Chris Hogan Patriots Jersey UK, had vowed,Ha Ha Clinton-Dix Packers Jersey UK, during the lead-up to the May 11 General and Regional Elections, to review the project after becoming convinced that it was costing taxpayers too much…the project is the second largest one after the US$200M Skeldon sugar factory.The new Government insists that it will not spend more than the US$150M budgeted for the project.However,Rod Woodson Steelers Jersey UK, an assessment recently found that other costs, including a car park, would have placed the final figure beyond the US$200M mark.According to Patterson yesterday, his initial assessment of the actual contract inked under the Bharrat Jagdeo administration in 2011,Kevin Greene Steelers Jersey UK, concluded that not much thought was put into the project and it appeared that it was written at the “back of a postage stamp”.The Minister argued that it would have been difficult for the Chinese to start engaging the Government in August 2011 and then have a contract prepared and signed by November of that year.He said that no one has been able to say what were the terms of reference given to the Chinese to prepare the tender that led to the eventual award of the contract to CHEC.The Chinese government had granted Guyana a loan for US$138M with the remaining US$12M coming from the local treasury.Patterson claimed that the Chinese are claiming that they were not provided enough information.As a matter of fact, there is little information to suggest who negotiated the deal on behalf of the Government of Guyana.The project appeared to have been put together, with contracts signed and works starting in less than 18 months.Minister Patterson was critical of “ridiculous” aspects of the contract including one clause which mandates the Government of Guyana to guarantee CHEC some 10-hour work per day.Patterson said that the initial thinking is to ensure a cap on the cost of the actual runway to ensure other aspects of the project are completed within budget.There have been other questionable expenses like toilets sets which cost in excess of $400,000 apiece.The contract had committed Guyana to providing filling materials like sand for the building of the runway.Critics have been lambasting the project, saying it was too expensive and the circumstances of the award of the contract to CHEC remains at best, blurry.The former administration, in pushing for the new airport, had argued that the country’s location makes it ideal as a South American hub from Africa.The limitations of the runway and terminal were also factors cited in need of expansion to allow for bigger aircraft and a growing tourism market.
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,A-Plus補習討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。A-Plus補習討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言(刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知),同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。

手機版|小黑屋|A-Plus互動討論區    

GMT+8, 2024-5-2 18:06 , Processed in 0.070885 second(s), 28 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表